This set of materials deal with the subject Claudius of Rome's conquer. The reading states the good aspects of Claudius, while the lecturer strongly contracts opposite idea. The speaker believes that Claudius was not a wisdom, innovated and fair ruler for some reasons.
The reading mentions that Claudius's innovations in positive way. First and foremost, the reading claims that he had the massive success about ruling the world.
for example he ruled three continents between 41 and 54 CE. What's more, he did some terrific innovations for citizenship and slaves. For instance, he built a new harbor and several new aqueducts for bringing the clean water to civil life. Also, the reading mentions the law which protects slaves and citizenship rights. Furthermore, he was not elected to power by the senates for that reason the hostility of ancient authors toward the reign of him.
In contrast, the lecturer emphasizes the negative sides of his reign. First of all, according to listening, Britain have destroyed and it didn't make him fair conquer. Secondly, the lecturer claims that he didn't have wisdom at all, corruption, unfair things happened when he was in rule. He opened a way to sell slaves more expensive and it made some class in the life. Especially, slaves corruption shows that he was not a good conquer to the world.
- Children over the age of 15 should be allowed to vote. 66
- “Globalization” refers to growing economic and cultural interconnectedness between different regions of the world. Because modern transportation and electronic communication has made commercial relationships between distant people easier than ever bef 81
- The most important things people learn are from their families? 60
- Some people suggest that it is wrong to give money to beggars asking for money on the street, while others think that it is the right thing to do. Which point of view do you think is correct, and why? 60
- Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725-1798) wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people, including kings and writers, his memoir has b 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ted and fair ruler for some reasons. The reading mentions that Claudiuss innovat...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...ssive success about ruling the world. for example he ruled three continents betwe...
^^^
Line 4, column 61, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
... three continents between 41 and 54 CE. Whats more, he did some terrific innovations ...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 139, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...istening, Britain have destroyed and it didnt make him fair conquer. Secondly, the le...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 206, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
.... Secondly, the lecturer claims that he didnt have wisdom at all, corruption, unfair ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1117.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 222.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03153153153 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54239677252 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594594594595 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.6326259069 49.2860985944 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.4666666667 110.228320801 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8 21.698381199 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160506537441 0.272083759551 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574910772549 0.0996497079465 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620565820988 0.0662205650399 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0908916564718 0.162205337803 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293431306222 0.0443174109184 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.3 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.