Essay topics:
Archaeologists have recently found a fossil of a 150-million-year-old mam-mal known as Repenomomus robustus (R. robustus). Interestingly, the mammal's stomach contained the remains of a psittacosaur dinosaur. Some researchers have therefore suggested that R. robustus was an active hunter of dinosaurs. However, a closer analysis has made the hypothesis that R. robustus was an active hunter unlikely. It was probably Just a scavenger that sometimes fed on dinosaur eggs containing unhatched dinosaurs.
First, R. robustus, like most mammals living 150 million years ago, was small—only about the size of a domestic cat. It was much smaller than psittacosaurs, which were almost two meters tall when full grown. Given this size difference, it is unlikely that R. robustus would have been able to successfully hunt psittacosaurs or similar dinosaurs.
Second, the legs of R. robustus appear much more suited for scavenging than hunting: they were short and positioned somewhat to the side rather than directly underneath the animal. These features suggest that R. robustus did not chase after prey. Psittacosaurs—the type of dinosaur found in the stomach of R. robustus—were fast moving. It is unlikely that they would have been caught by such short-legged animals.
Third, the dinosaur bones inside the stomach of the R. robustus provide no evidence to support the idea that the dinosaur had been actively hunted. When an animal has been hunted and eaten by another animal, there are usually teeth marks on the bones of the animal that was eaten. But the bones of the psittaco-saur inside the R. robustus stomach do not have teeth marks. This suggests that R. robustus found an unguarded dinosaur nest with eggs and simply swallowed an egg with the small psittacosaur still inside the eggshell.
The article introduces the topic of the eating habits of R.robustus. The recent discovery in the fossil of R.robustus has found evidence of Pisttacosaurs in their stomach. The writer says the remains were obtained as they scavenge and feed on egg nests and eggshells. However, the lecturer disagrees. She believes that R. robust have hunted pisttacosaurs and attacks each claim made in the passage.
First of all, the reading suggests that the Robustus had a small size body like that of a modern cat and they were not able to hunt the two-meter-tall pisttacosaurs. But the lecturer claims that robustus could have hunted the baby pisttacosaurs or the species of small size as their body were twice greater than their stomach. She adds the robustus have hunted the baby pisttcosaurs.
She goes on to say that, the small length and little size legs doesn't signify that the animal doesn't hunt. She provides the example of Tanminias Devil who have small leg and small size body but is an active and successful predator and also they can run up to 15km/hr, which is a pretty good speed. Hence, she mentions that robustus while having small feet they might not be scavengers but the ones with good speed to hunt the robustus.
Furthermore, she contends, robust might have swallowed the whole pisttcosaurs without chewing. She mentions that robust did not use their back teeth for chewing that overmark the function of the powerful jaw. Hence, she claims that there was no bone shown to be actively hunted, and also there was no presence of teeth mark for the same reason. She argues, when animals is directly swallowed you cannot have some teeth makers there.
To sum up, both the writer and professor hold conflicting views about the eating habit of R. robustus. It’s clear that they will have trouble finding the common ground in this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-18 | ishi_jais | 66 | view |
| 2021-11-29 | Ranju01 | 85 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | SAPTORSHI GUPTA | 80 | view |
| 2020-09-09 | Akhil_Maddukuri | 73 | view |
| 2020-09-09 | Akhil_Maddukuri | 66 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past 73
- Essay topics Archaeologists have recently found a fossil of a 150 million year old mam mal known as Repenomomus robustus R robustus Interestingly the mammal s stomach contained the remains of a psittacosaur dinosaur Some researchers have therefore suggest 85
- It is more important to keep your old friend than to make new friends 66
- The expression ever never give up means to keep trying and never stop working for your goals Do you agree or disagree with this statement Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 40
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ence of Pisttacosaurs in their stomach. The writer says the remains were obtained a...
^^^
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
..., the small length and little size legs doesnt signify that the animal doesnt hunt. Sh...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ize legs doesnt signify that the animal doesnt hunt. She provides the example of Tanmi...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nt signify that the animal doesnt hunt. She provides the example of Tanminias Devil...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, while, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 314.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8821656051 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48175826832 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557324840764 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 3.25607064018 307% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.4220246214 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1666666667 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4444444444 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72222222222 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180405944337 0.272083759551 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621920749139 0.0996497079465 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622911386759 0.0662205650399 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108947617617 0.162205337803 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511700189875 0.0443174109184 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.