Essay topics: extinction of living organisms in end of Triassic period
The reading and the lecture are both about massive extinction at the end of Triassic period. The author of the reading feels that rhree possible reasons caused end of life at thar exact period of time. The lecturer challenges the claims made by the author. She is of the opinion that none of the suggested reasons are accurate.
To begin with, the author of the passage argues that extinction might be a consequence of sea level decline. The article mentions that this natural process destroyed precostal and shallow water inhabitants which caused violation in food chain and led to mass extinction. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims scientists agree with fluctuation of water during that period of time; however it is unlikely to cause destruction of species. Additionally, he says change of sea level lasted for million years, but to bring distinction it should have happened suddenly.
Secondly, the writer suggests a version of cool climate. In the article, it is said that volcanic eruptions at that time period cause release of sulfur dioxide to atmosphere, which is likely to cause global temperature decline. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by mentioning its presense in atmosphere nowadays.It combines with water in atmosphere and falls as a rain, so it will bw incorrect to state that large amount of sulfur dioxide could have caused extinction.
Finally, the author posits that asteroid hit probably was a reason. Moreover, it is stated in the article that soil, displaced after asteroid strike, raced into atmosphere and blocked sunlight for month or even years which caused death of plants and animals. In contrast, the lecturer’s position is absence of asteroid. He elabortes on this by bringing up the point that none of craters after asteroid hit were found. Only craters that were found belong to period of twelve years before.
- In 1995 a microscopic fungus called phytophthora ramorum, or P. ramorum, was first detected in the forests of the western United States. P. ramorum infects trees and causes particularly serious damage in oak trees: in many infected oaks, leaves wither rap 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO-50 - Integrated Writing Task: Scientists are considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars in the coming decades. Although there have been successful manned missions to the Moon in the 1960s and 1970s, Mars is 150 times further away from Earth 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now. 81
- TPO- 54 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ossible three causes of the extinction. The lecturer challenges the claims made by ...
^^^
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...e with fluctuation of water during that period of time; however it is unlikely to cause destru...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 521, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
... he says change of sea level lasted for million years, but to bring distinction it shou...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 30.3222958057 171% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 304.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10855263158 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82249685329 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585526315789 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3830807378 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2777777778 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8888888889 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72222222222 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.27373068433 257% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0846256295762 0.272083759551 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0278063511409 0.0996497079465 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067524067753 0.0662205650399 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0573610390527 0.162205337803 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503968820369 0.0443174109184 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 63.6247240618 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.