Ethanol fuel as a replacement for gasoline and its consequences
The passage is about the use of ethanol fuel as a replacement for gasoline and its consequences. It states that this increasing use will lead to major problems and has lots of disadvantages. However, the professor do not agree with this statement and any of the author's reasons.
First, the article claims that since burning of ethanol also releases carbon dioxide into the air, it will offer no benefits for global warming at all. The lecturer disagrees with this idea. He believes that due to the source of ethanol fuel production which are plants, they will not be harm full for global warming. These plants such as corn needs carbon dioxide for their growth and this will compensate the amount released when being burnt.
Second, the author point to the reduction of the plants which are currently being used to feed farm animals as a disadvantage of using ethanol fuel. However, The professor contradicts this statement by explaining the it's production process. He claims that this fuel has not to be produced by crops such as corn itself and companies can use selulose which can be found in the parts of plants that are not being used as food.
Furthermore, it is stated in the article that the cost of these fuel is much higher than gasoline despite of it's current same price due to governmental tax subsidies. Nevertheless, the lecturer claims that if the use of this fuel increase the cost will be reduced due to mass production methods and point out that if the use of it increase 3 times as it is now, the price would be reduced be 40 percent.
- The reasons that support the migration of Edmontosaurus 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 65
- How to stop the decrements of Torreya Taxifoha? 3
- Ethanol fuel as a replacement for gasoline and its consequences 60
- The increment in human population caused reduction in birds population 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'its'?
Suggestion: the; its
...ontradicts this statement by explaining the its production process. He claims that this...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1287.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 274.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69708029197 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53954813 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503649635036 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 389.7 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2980008439 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.25 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230591550562 0.272083759551 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105223812265 0.0996497079465 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15007422245 0.0662205650399 227% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155123795056 0.162205337803 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069372460591 0.0443174109184 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 53.8541721854 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.