EX2
In the reading, the author claims that smart cars will provide safer, quicker, and less expensive driving. However, finding all the advantages questionable and implausible, the lecturer repudiates the claim and presents some evidence to the contrary.
At first, the author argues that smart cars are much safer since they prevent many accidents occurring each day and therefore they can save lives effectively. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that smart cars still get to some accidents. Since new advanced technology lets cars drive tightly packed together on the roads, the possibility of accidents will increase. After all, no evidence has been presented so for to collaborate the idea which smart cars reduce the number of accidents.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that employing smart cars will eliminate the traffic problems and its congestion because it will result in a growth of highway speeds. That being said, the lecturer disputes this benefit by clarifying the fact that if people feel using smart cars is more comfortable, they will use it too much so that the number of cars driving on the highways will be increased. It goes without saying that these additional cars lead to congestion and make people spend a considerable amount of their time in traffics.
Finally, the author draws attention to reduction in costs such as less expenses for repairing routes or changing cars’ accessories like tires. Yet again, the lecturer dismisses it by pointing out that using global positioning system is highly expensive. Moreover, the sensors used in these cars are costly too. Hence, the added expenses by using these new devices and technology will be more than the money saved by less repairing roads or changing tires and other essential things.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-11-09 | smt.hosseini | 3 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 67, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun expenses is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...attention to reduction in costs such as less expenses for repairing routes or changi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, hence, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, after all, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 290.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19655172414 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60815742177 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603448275862 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1070768062 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.923076923 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06452816374 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.