extinction of living organisms in end of Triassic period
The reading and the lecture are both about how the extinction of living species in end of Triassic period 200 million year ago. The author of reading gives possible theory to explain the cause of extinction.The lecturer casts doubt on the theory made in the article. She thinks that these all are not good explanation for this.
First of all, the author claims that coastal and shallow-ocean species destroyed due to inclination of sea levels, and it led to the effect of food chain worldwide. This point is challenged by lecturer. She says that it is true That much extinction could not happen suddenly after changing in sea level. Additionally, coastal are able to survive on that climate because of having such adaptation.
Secondly, the author states that because of volcanic activity, Sulfur Dioxide was released because of volcanic activities over there, which caused the lowering the temperature, and led to extinctions. The lecturer refutes this point by asserting that sulfur dioxide is still present in atmosphere due to volcanic activities Generally, sulfur dioxide combine with ocean water and fall on earth as rain. So, it is not true that much amount of sulfur dioxide can led to this much extinctions.
Thirdly, the author mentions that asteroids had strikes on earth, and it led to displaced debris thrown up into the atmosphere, where it had block out the sunlight for several months. The lecturer, on the other hand, states that scientists had found hit asteroid on earth long before end of the Triassic period. They have dated the time, so it can be said that extinctions did not occurred due to asteroid activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...eory to explain the cause of extinction.The lecturer casts doubt on the theory made...
^^^
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...eory to explain the cause of extinction.The lecturer casts doubt on the theory made...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...all are not good explanation for this. First of all, the author claims that co...
^^^
Line 2, column 40, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... First of all, the author claims that coastal and shallow-ocean species destro...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ate because of having such adaptation. Secondly, the author states that because...
^^
Line 3, column 474, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...mount of sulfur dioxide can led to this much extinctions. Thirdly, the author men...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xide can led to this much extinctions. Thirdly, the author mentions that astero...
^^
Line 4, column 383, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'occur'
Suggestion: occur
...it can be said that extinctions did not occurred due to asteroid activities.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, first of all, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1368.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01098901099 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65949706399 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567765567766 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5493299115 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.230769231 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30769230769 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147378781485 0.272083759551 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536256394764 0.0996497079465 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108364091131 0.0662205650399 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0919479568898 0.162205337803 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822123350605 0.0443174109184 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.