four day work week
The article states that four time work week has plenty of benefits for both employees and workers. It also provides three reasons to support the claim. However, the speaker explains that four day work week runs some risks that can cut down all of the advantages of such worker regime. He refutes each of reasons used in the passage.
To begin with, the writer insists that employee will work better and make fewer mistakes in the case of four day work week. The lecturer contends this point by explaining that it is not so profitable for companies because they will be forced to hire additional stuff that calls for additional costs. These costs are for computers, more room office, healthcare costs, and others.
What is more, the reading reports that move to four day work week will create new occupations, because employees will have to compensate the missing work hours. In contrast, the listening asserts that this burden may lie down on current employees. This is because in point of the company view the stuff is rested and is able to conduct more labor. Hence, employs can force employees to overwork, that will not create new work places.
In addition, the article claims that quality of life will increase because of having more spare time by a company’s stuff. However, the lecture opposes this point by asserting that people how are used to work for four days instead of five, will be limited in searching of a new job. They may will not attend an occupation for five day work week. Furthermore, this reason coupled with those companies can pass their four day working stuff over in promotion, because employers want to have managers that work throughout the entire work week. This is important because the consistency of managing should be saved.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-10-20 | Hello GRE | 80 | view |
2024-03-25 | TANVIR SIDDIKE MOIN | 70 | view |
2023-07-17 | nusybah | 78 | view |
2023-07-01 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
2023-07-01 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
- Some people believe that students should be given one long vacation each year. Others believe that students should have several short vacations throughout the year. Which viewpoint do you agree with? Use specific reasons 70
- University 76
- Many students have to live with roommates while going to school or university. What are some of the important qualities of a good roommate? Use specific reasons and examples to explain why these qualities are important. 60
- space tourism 90
- What famous place would you like to visit? Use details and reasons to support your response. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... week runs some risks that can cut down all of the advantages of such worker regime. He re...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 119, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'week' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'weeks'.
Suggestion: weeks
...r mistakes in the case of four day work week. The lecturer contends this point by ex...
^^^^
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'week' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'weeks'.
Suggestion: weeks
...ding reports that move to four day work week will create new occupations, because em...
^^^^
Line 4, column 345, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'week' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'weeks'.
Suggestion: weeks
... attend an occupation for five day work week. Furthermore, this reason coupled with ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, in addition, in contrast, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 302.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86092715232 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38352641963 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546357615894 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.7833801231 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.75 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3125 7.06452816374 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.439917101963 0.272083759551 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158024190923 0.0996497079465 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.177325578196 0.0662205650399 268% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.312746570156 0.162205337803 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692958310866 0.0443174109184 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.8541721854 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.