frog population
In this set of materials, the reading and lecture both discuss the frog's population declining. The writer strongly postulates that protection of frogs is necessary as they prevent diseases to human by eradicating the insects, and propose tthree theories to endorse the survival of frog's population. However, the lecture posits that points made in the reading are impractical and dubious and gainsays each of them.
First and foremost, the writer begins by asserting that use of pesticides by farmer to exceed their crops production is deteriorating the frogs population as frogs are dying off by such chemicals. On the other hand, the lecturer dismisses the claim by positioning its not economically fair to the farmers if they are prevented to use pesticides on their crops.He goes on saying that farmers living closer to frog's population would be immensly affected by not utilizing the pesticides. As farmers from their sorrounding areas would be able to grow more crops after fertilizers application, and thus get benefit by increased yield and crop productions compared to the farmers who are prevented to use pesticides.
Furthermore, the lecturer mentions that treatment suggested by the reading would be applied individually to each frog. It is arduous to capture each and every infected frog as their number are on large scale. On top of that, the infected frogs transmit the disease to their offsprings, hence they would need the tretment as well. Consequently, it will be extremely complicated and expensive way of treatment. These points clearly refutes the writer's implication that frogs can be cured by preventing them from the fungus that cause thickening of their skin and eventually their death from dehydration.
Ultimetely, the writer wraps its argument by declaring that
if human extensive usage of water from water and marshes preveted then frog population can be saved. Not surprisingly, the lecturer takes an issue with notion by contending that more that human water usage global warming is causing threatning situation to wetland ares such as lakes and marshes. if that prevented
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-12 | mraru | 80 | view |
| 2021-09-19 | zahra.tmmm | 80 | view |
| 2021-09-19 | zahra.tmmm | 80 | view |
| 2021-09-19 | zahra.tmmm | 80 | view |
| 2021-05-04 | talelaldabous | 76 | view |
- The golden frog is a small bright yellow amphibian that lives in and around mountain streams in Panama The species is severely endangered because of a fungus that infects the frog through its skin and inhibits the frog s critical life functions such as br 80
- Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing to the 90
- people spend monay on long lasting thinhs such as jewelry other spend on short lived pleasure like travelling prefer 90
- model of a paiting 80
- reading newspaper is better thatn electronic devices to get information agree on not 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'frogs'' or 'frog's'?
Suggestion: frogs'; frog's
...he reading and lecture both discuss the frogs population declining. The writer strong...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 139, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'frogs'' or 'frog's'?
Suggestion: frogs'; frog's
...r crops production is deteriorating the frogs population as frogs are dying off by su...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 264, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...urer dismisses the claim by positioning its not economically fair to the farmers if...
^^^
Line 2, column 360, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: He
...vented to use pesticides on their crops.He goes on saying that farmers living clos...
^^
Line 4, column 443, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...tment. These points clearly refutes the writers implication that frogs can be cured by...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 480, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he writers implication that frogs can be cured by preventing them from the fungus...
^^
Line 6, column 3, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wraps its argument by declaring that if human extensive usage of water from wate...
^^
Line 6, column 298, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...wetland ares such as lakes and marshes. if that prevented
^^
Line 6, column 298, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...wetland ares such as lakes and marshes. if that prevented
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, then, thus, well, such as, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.01324503311 299% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1775.0 1373.03311258 129% => OK
No of words: 336.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28273809524 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85539225883 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535714285714 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 419.366225166 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.7598601464 49.2860985944 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.785714286 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06452816374 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330830963686 0.272083759551 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122626363211 0.0996497079465 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115837646253 0.0662205650399 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167316804374 0.162205337803 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0989699615195 0.0443174109184 223% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 63.6247240618 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.