The passage and lecture both discus the declination of frog population. The passage gives three methods to solve this problem. But the lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article, She says, non of these methods are practical to prevent frog inclination.
First, the author states, prevent using of pesticides will decrease frogs extinction, he mentions, pesticides attacks frogs nerves system and lead to the frogs death. The professor refutes this point, he suggests that when the farmers stop spraying pesticides, this will effect plants, because it will dcrease their growth, therefore this method will cause economic problem.
Second, the writer argues, using antifungus to prevent the fungi to attack frogs skin and lead to dehydration, since frogs absorbed water by their skin, The professor contradicts this argument, she points out, it is so difficult to apply the antifungi for each individual, in addition this medication dose not pass to offspring, therefore we need to apply this medication to these offspring.
Finally, the author illustrates to the human being who damage frog habitats like lakes by using a lot of water, however, the lecturer in the other hand stats that frogs habitats destroyed by globel warming which leads to decrease level of water in the lakes, and human being have a not remarkable effect on frogs habitats.
The passage and lecture both discus the declination of frog population. The passage gives three methods to solve this problem. But the lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article, She says, non of these methods are practical to prevent frog inclination.
First, the author states, prevent using of pesticides will decrease frogs extinction, he mentions, pesticides attacks frogs nerves system and lead to the frogs death. The professor refutes this point, he suggests that when the farmers stop spraying pesticides, this will effect plants, because it will dcrease their growth, therefore this method will cause economic problem.
Second, the writer argues, using antifungus to prevent the fungi to attack frogs skin and lead to dehydration, since frogs absorbed water by their skin, The professor contradicts this argument, she points out, it is so difficult to apply the antifungi for each individual, in addition this medication dose not pass to offspring, therefore we need to apply this medication to these offspring.
Finally, the author illustrates to the human being who damage frog habitats like lakes by using a lot of water, however, the lecturer in the other hand stats that frogs habitats destroyed by globel warming which leads to decrease level of water in the lakes, and human being have a not remarkable effect on frogs habitats.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-04 | talelaldabous | 76 | view |
- The reading passage and the lecture disccuses how to prevent birds from injury by hitting in building made of glass material The writer claims several solution for this problem However the lecturer casts dout on claim made in article He suggests non solut 60
- Thr reading passage and the lecture are both talking about using technique called burning mirror by Creek to defense themselves from Roman navy The writer has several reasons to debate thgis story and says it just myth However the lecturer has another opi 76
- The passage and lecture are both about methods which are used to decrease possibility of declination and extinction of frog population The author elaborates on three methods that help in decreasing of declination of frogs The lecturer casts doubt on claim 76
- The reading passage and the lecture are both talking about causes of extiniction of a huge type of marine mammal called Steller s sea cow which live in Steller The reading passage caims several reasons for extiniction However the lecturer casts doubt on c 66
- Now a days there is ahuge technology revolution in many field of life One of the important one is the computers which is devise used in a lot of field kids usualy play games by using computer in my openion playing games these game is a waste of time In th 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The passage and lecture both discus the ...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...practical to prevent frog inclination. First, the author states, prevent using ...
^^
Line 2, column 157, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'frogs'' or 'frog's'?
Suggestion: frogs'; frog's
...cks frogs nerves system and lead to the frogs death. The professor refutes this point...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 273, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...ers stop spraying pesticides, this will effect plants, because it will dcrease their g...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly this medication to these offspring. Finally, the author illustrates to the h...
^^^
Line 4, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ogs habitats destroyed by globel warming which leads to decrease level of water i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1137.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 217.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23963133641 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57520822926 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603686635945 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 21.2450331126 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 116.76699282 49.2860985944 237% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 162.428571429 110.228320801 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 21.698381199 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 7.06452816374 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.415392068701 0.272083759551 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.250394090637 0.0996497079465 251% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.165690259723 0.0662205650399 250% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287918456432 0.162205337803 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.289104946822 0.0443174109184 652% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.3589403974 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 53.8541721854 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.0289183223 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.498013245 137% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.