GENETICALLY MODIFIED TREES
Reading:
Genetic modification, a process used to change an organism’s genes and hence its characteristics, is now being used to improve trees through genetic modification. It is possible to create trees that produce more fruit, grow faster, or withstand adverse conditions. Planting genetically modified trees on a large scale promises to bring a number of benefits.
First, genetically modified trees are designed to be hardier than nature trees; that is, they are more likely to survive than their unmodified counterparts. In Hawaii, for example, a new pest-resistant species of papaya trees has been developed in response to ring spot virus infections that have repeatedly damaged the native papaya tree population. Planting the genetically modified papayas has largely put an end to the ringspot problem.
Moreover, genetically modified trees promise to bring a number of economic benefits to those who grow them. Genetically modified trees tend to grow faster, give greater yields of food, fruit, or other products and be hardier. This allows tree farmer to get faster and greater returns on their farming investment and save on pesticides as well.
Finally, the use of genetically modified trees can prevent overexploitation of wild trees. Because of the growing demand for firewood and building timber, many forests around the world are being cut down faster than they can be replaced. Introducing genetically modified trees,designed for fast growth and high yield in given geographic conditions,would satisfy the demand for wood in many of those areas and save the endangered native trees, which often include unique or rare species.
Listening:
Sure, there are some benefits to plant genetically modified trees, but, are these trees as really great as they first sound? When you examine the subject firstly, there are some serious problems and costs associated with genetically modified trees.
First, genetically modified trees may be resistant to one particular condition. But that doesn’t necessarily ensure their survival. You see, a typical non modified trees’ population is genetically diverse. That means that for most threatening conditions, or climate, whatever, there will be at least some individual tress of any given species of tree that are resistant. So even if most of one kind of trees are killed, those few resistant tress will survive and ensure the survival of that species of tree. But genetically modified trees are genetically much more uniform. So if they’re exposed to an environmental challenge they have not been designed for, they all die. So if the climate changes, the genetically modified trees will likely to be completely wiped out.
Now as to the second point, they’re hidden costs associated with genetically modified trees. You see, the company that genetically modify the tree can charge tree farmers more for its seeds than un- genetically modified trees would cost. Also, as you’ve grown the tree, you can’t just collect the seeds and plant the new tree for free. By law, you have to pay the company every time you plant.
And finally, genetically modified trees might actually cause even more damage to the local wild trees. You see, genetically modified trees often grow more aggressively than natural trees do. And, genetically modified trees are typically planted among natural trees. As a result, the genetically modified trees outcompete the native trees for resources, sunlight, soil, nutrients, and water, eventually crowding out the natural trees.
The author proposed several advantages of planting genetically modified trees. Nevertheless, the lecturer disagrees with them for a couple of reasons.
While the author maintains that genetically modified trees are more competitive compared to natural trees, the lecturer argues that this only suits a particular condition. Because the gene pool of genetically modified trees is usually less diverse, it would be more difficult for them to survive various conditions like harsher weathers or pest infestations. As a result, they are going to die out owing to the similarity of the genes they carried.
Also, the lecturer points out that tree farmers would actually spend more money on seeding genetically modified trees since seeds of those special trees are much more expensive than traditional seeds. And it is legally accepted that farmers have to pay the company who provide seeds everytime they grow the seeds. Although the genetically modified trees would yield more products efficiently, farmers would not gain true profits and benefits from growing them.
Moreover, the lecturer also states that genetically modified trees would do more harm to the environment rather than being eco-friendly. Since they grow aggressively and they are usually planted among wild trees of same species, they would compete with wild trees over resources as sunlight and water. Attribute to this, wild trees would be wiped out.
- ETHANOL FUEL Reading Ethanol fuel made from plants such as corn and sugar cane has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States However many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline for several 85
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- Which has a larger influence on the society: Automobiles or airplanes? 90
- Agree or disagree Teaching is harder than it was in the past 90
- TPO14 integrated writing: Salvage logging 70
to survive various conditions
to survive in various conditions
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 26 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 12
No. of Words: 221 250
No. of Characters: 1172 1200
No. of Different Words: 128 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.856 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.303 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.595 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 79 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 71 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 47 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 26 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.091 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.28 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.455 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.429 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.647 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.163 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4