The article discuss about the advantages of groupthinking and support it with three reasons. However, the professor doesn't think so and states that group thinking has considerable disadvantages and refutes each of the article's claims.
First, the article states that group discussion gives us the better approach to problem solving and idea creation. However, the professor doesn't think so and state that group discussion sometimes make decision which are worst. Because, in group discussion individual thinks as a whole . So, the decisions made by group discussion are irrational.
Second, the article avers that in team respsonsibiltiy is spread around, so thatheir is no individual to blame if decision leads to failure so team disussion will gives the relevent solution. Howver, the professor refute this point by stating that often the indivual memeber are ignored in the team. He gives the example for research team where opinion of researcher was ignored by the management team.
Third, the article states that group discussion encourage motivation in tem members. To cast doubt on this point the professor gives the example of legislation team where the team feels vulnerable when they were not able to catch single individual. The team feels that they are outsmart by the one individual. He also states that team memebrs often reassume each others. He also gives the example of Fiasco automobile failure to support his point.
essay
- Professor's appearance on television. 73
- Productivity and Rewards 60
- Is it more important to be able to work alone or with group of people on a team or to work independently! Use reasons and specific example to support your choice 60
- Claim: Even though young people often receive the advice to “follow your dreams,” more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals.Reason: Many people’s dreams are inherently selfish. 50
- tidal power- integrated task 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...h three reasons. However, the professor doesnt think so and states that group thinking...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...d idea creation. However, the professor doesnt think so and state that group discussio...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... discussion individual thinks as a whole . So, the decisions made by group discuss...
^^
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'give'
Suggestion: give
...leads to failure so team disussion will gives the relevent solution. Howver, the prof...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...relevent solution. Howver, the professor refute this point by stating that often ...
^^
Line 7, column 279, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'outsmarted'.
Suggestion: outsmarted
...ndividual. The team feels that they are outsmart by the one individual. He also states t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 449, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...utomobile failure to support his point. essay
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Essay
...mobile failure to support his point. essay
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1226.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 229.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35371179039 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70376059611 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550218340611 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.4888901969 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5714285714 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3571428571 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.07142857143 7.06452816374 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240307302503 0.272083759551 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113137835428 0.0996497079465 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155825901493 0.0662205650399 235% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184795318061 0.162205337803 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.16572816511 0.0443174109184 374% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.