how does the information in thelisting passage cast doubt on the informatin presented in the reading passage?
Should governing boards ban using of PEDs?
According to the reading passages, governing boards of sports should not ban using of PEds in sports. These materials can help athletes to achieve greatness and championess. But the listening passage gives some reasons to cast doubt on the reading passage's idea.
as the reading passage climes, using these drugs is one the dangers that aid athletes to have better performances. Although using PEds is associated with the certain dangers for athletes health, but the decision of using or not using them is completely depends on the personal view of the athlete and should not be a governing issue. In the opposite side, the listing passage explains that, every sport have certain rules and always athletes confront with the restrictions that governing boards passé them. The only thing that is personal choice in sports is to participate in them or not.
The second reason for using PEds is that, putting ban rules on the PEDs gives this opportunity to wealthier athletes to be prosperous, because they have more chance to use that drugs which are not detectable. But the listening passage says that, if the sports governors do not ban these things, the wealthier athletes would have this chance to use better and stronger drugs.
Finally the listing passage denies the reading passage's idea about freely using of PEDs.
- learning a foreign language. 70
- how does the information in thelisting passage cast doubt on the informatin presented in the reading passage Should governing boards ban using of PEDs 58
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?I think there is too much violence in movies. 73
- The Eropean educatin system 66
- professioanal athletes, such as football or basketball players, should not be paid the high slaries thet they receive from their teams. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...st doubt on the reading passages idea. as the reading passage climes, using these...
^^
Line 2, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ne the dangers that aid athletes to have better performances. Although using PEds...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...nce to use better and stronger drugs. Finally the listing passage denies the reading ...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'if', 'second', 'so']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.264705882353 0.261695866417 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.197478991597 0.158904122519 124% => OK
Adjectives: 0.063025210084 0.0723426182421 87% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0420168067227 0.0435111971325 97% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0168067226891 0.0277247811725 61% => OK
Prepositions: 0.105042016807 0.128828473217 82% => OK
Participles: 0.0546218487395 0.0370669169778 147% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.47169080524 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0378151260504 0.0208969081088 181% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.121848739496 0.128158765124 95% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0168067226891 0.0158828679856 106% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0126050420168 0.0114777025283 110% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1324.0 1645.83664459 80% => OK
No of words: 219.0 271.125827815 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.04566210046 6.08160592843 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 4.04852973271 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.37899543379 0.374372842146 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.287671232877 0.287516216867 100% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.168949771689 0.187439937562 90% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0958904109589 0.113142543107 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47169080524 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506849315068 0.539623497131 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 45.3789926184 53.8517498576 84% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0529801325 77% => OK
Sentence length: 21.9 21.7502111507 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0623664464 49.3711431718 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.4 132.220823453 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9 21.7502111507 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.878197800319 57% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 50.6671232877 50.5018328374 100% => OK
Elegance: 1.65573770492 1.90840788429 87% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.466932056365 0.549887131256 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.165750759486 0.142949733639 116% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0958918747556 0.0787303798458 122% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.676698793245 0.631733273073 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.164394752969 0.139662658121 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.244992798764 0.266732575781 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109570207601 0.103435571967 106% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.350824656008 0.414875509568 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.114935589947 0.0530846634433 217% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.350155471743 0.40443939384 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0762219898262 0.0528353158467 144% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 3.1766004415 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 8.0 10.2958057395 78% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.