Humans have long been fascinated by elephants, the largest land animal in the modern world.
Both the reading and the lecture talk about the fascinating facts about elephants. In the passage, the author mentions a few common believes about them. While in the lecture, the professor casts doubt on them as they are not scientifically accurate. She thinks these behavior patterns are due to other causes.
The author states that the old elephants are aware of their approaching death. In the lecture, the professor argues that the behavior of old elephants when they are old comes from their inability to chew well. She says that the old elephants own weaker teeth compared to younger ones. As a result, they need to find the vegetations which are softer than what the rest of elephants are eating in the herd. Consequently, the old elephants need to leave the herd in order to find food, and they will end up near water where the vegetation is green and soft. As they are old, they might die when they are near the water, which is called the elephants' graveyard.
Furthermore, the author mentions that the elephants have artistic ability, which is exclusive to humans. The professor refutes that by pointing out that the elephants are not aware of what they are doing. She says the elephants are being tamed by the humans to do particular brush strokes while they do not know clearly what they are doing.
Finally, the author in the reading asserts that the elephants are afraid of mice. The professor argues that fear is because the mice are unfamiliar creatures to the elephants. The elephants who have not seen a mouse before will find it peculiar and think there is a threat. As a result, they would react to it. On the other hand, the elephants which have been kept in a zoo won't show any reaction when encountering a mouse.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-23 | nusybah | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-01 | rodrian | 65 | view |
| 2023-02-25 | reza_fattahi | 83 | view |
| 2022-12-15 | HSNDEK | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-25 | nikki07hung | 80 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To improve the quality of education universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors 66
- possibility of sending humans to Mars 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 43
- possibility of sending humans to Mars 85
- Edmontosaurus migration 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[6]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun common seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'little common'.
Suggestion: little common
.... In the passage, the author mentions a few common believes about them. While in the lectu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 637, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'elephants'' or 'elephant's'?
Suggestion: elephants'; elephant's
...are near the water, which is called the elephants graveyard. Furthermore, the author men...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, furthermore, if, so, well, while, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.4613686534 201% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 305.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70163934426 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45226614478 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481967213115 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 437.4 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.1902873908 49.2860985944 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.6666666667 110.228320801 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9444444444 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.06452816374 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138422291382 0.272083759551 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465134633868 0.0996497079465 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381948834062 0.0662205650399 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0883856321907 0.162205337803 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443978778857 0.0443174109184 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.3589403974 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 53.8541721854 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 12.2367328918 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.42419426049 86% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.2008830022 62% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.