Imagine that you are planning to take a vacation and are trying to decide between two places to visit. Which of these two options do you believe would give you better information about making your choice? Why?۱٫ Reading about the places online۲٫ Discu

Essay topics:

Imagine that you are planning to take a vacation and are trying to decide between two places to visit. Which of these two options do you believe would give you better information about making your choice? Why?
۱٫ Reading about the places online
۲٫ Discussing them with someone you know who has visited both places

It is obvious that people like to use their vacation in the best way because it will be beneficial for them and will help them to get enough energy to focus on their daily activities. Thus, it is important for them to choose a suitable place for visiting when they are planning to take a vacation. In order to make a better decision regarding place where they like to visit, they can utilize various resources and gat their necessary information about their places. I strongly believe that it is much better for them to read about the places online than discussing them with someone who visited these places. In the following paragraphs, I will discuss my view using some reasons and examples.
To begin with, I believe that in today's fast-paced word, people have access to the Internet on their smart phones or on the laptop computer; hence, they can easily search various places on the Internet and get required information about it. In addition, this information is up-to-date, while if they discuss with someone who visited the places before, it is possible that they visited these places several years ago. Hence, their information about these places is old and is not reliable. For example, last year I decided to go on vacation to visit a historical place. I read on about two historical places on the Internet. It helped me to choose one of these places to visit. Also, I discuss them with my friend, he could not give me accurate information about them because he did not aware that one of these place was destroyed by earthquake. Therefore using online resources is much better than discussing them with other people.
Moreover, I think people who have already visited the places explain them according to their interests and desires. It is likely that they do not like one of these places for their personal reasons. As a result, they are not able to convey correct information about them to other individuals. For instance, my brother discussed two places with his colleague, because he had bad experience about one of these places; thus, he discourages my brother from visiting this place. In fact, it is possible that other individuals cannot express accurate data about the places, while using Internet you can have access to reliable facts about various places in a short period of time.
To sum up, according to the points and examples mentioned above, It is better for people to read about the places online instead of discussing them with other people.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-10-11 zabanenglish 73 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user zabanenglish :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 845, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...hese place was destroyed by earthquake. Therefore using online resources is much better t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 659, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...e facts about various places in a short period of time. To sum up, according to the points a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in fact, as a result, to begin with, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 72.0 22.412803532 321% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 30.3222958057 231% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2057.0 1373.03311258 150% => OK
No of words: 424.0 270.72406181 157% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85141509434 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.04702891845 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49704234978 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 145.348785872 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.445754716981 0.540411800872 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 661.5 419.366225166 158% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 21.0 3.25607064018 645% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 8.23620309051 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5993653578 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.263157895 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3157894737 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.47368421053 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302983444794 0.272083759551 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118026843849 0.0996497079465 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646107684759 0.0662205650399 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200778076552 0.162205337803 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540480772391 0.0443174109184 122% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.