Instead of holding books or newspapers people nowadays normally hold electronic devices and watch bright screens to receive information and news Although it is much more comfortable than reading through paper materials there are many side effects of elect
The author of the reading passage feels that they are three explanations for the repercussions of using electronic devices. However, the lecturer casts doubt on all the reasons mentioned in the article by saying that these reasons are faulty.
To begin with, the first solution mentioned in the reading suggests that when people learn something from the electronic devices, it hinders their critical thinking because the majority of the sources are from the normal people whose perspective is not professional. On the other hand, in the listening material, the professor contends the argument made in the reading by saying that the newspaper's information is limited. Additionally, she says that it gives only a certain viewpoint of a particular topic.
The second reason in the reading mentions that people who always use computers or smartphones have higher possibilities to have severe eye issues or brain damage. The lecture, conversely, disagrees with this explanation. The professor explains that there is no plenty of proof to support the theory. Also, she notes that as long as regular rest is taken and doing stretches, these outcomes can be prevented.
Finally, the writer of the reading passage believes that electronic devices stop us from interacting skills with other people. In contrast, it is accentuated in the lecture that it serves as with a variety of sources which gives us to share our thoughts with a myriad of people.
- Instead of holding books or newspapers people nowadays normally hold electronic devices and watch bright screens to receive information and news Although it is much more comfortable than reading through paper materials there are many side effects of elect 73
- Supermarkets should only sell food produce from within their country rather than from oversea What is your opinion on this 66
- Instead of holding books or newspapers people nowadays normally hold electronic devices and watch bright screens to receive information and news Although it is much more comfortable than reading through paper materials there are many side effects of elect 3
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 79
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y saying that these reasons are faulty. To begin with, the first solution mentio...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 389, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'newspapers'' or 'newspaper's'?
Suggestion: newspapers'; newspaper's
... made in the reading by saying that the newspapers information is limited. Additionally, s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...rsely, disagrees with this explanation. The professor explains that there is no ple...
^^^
Line 7, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g skills with other people. In contrast, it is accentuated in the lecture that it...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, however, second, so, in contrast, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1219.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 233.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23175965665 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79878349356 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600858369099 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5262351678 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.818181818 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1818181818 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.09090909091 7.06452816374 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0956572985661 0.272083759551 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0313561037478 0.0996497079465 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363956377721 0.0662205650399 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.053849405412 0.162205337803 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313219222166 0.0443174109184 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.