integrated 48
The reading passage introduces three ways to prevent the population of frogs from declining. On the other hand, all these methods are refuted by the speaker due to following reasons.
First, even though the reading passage states that the government should enact laws that prevent farmers to use pesticides which are harmful for frogs, the lecturer contends that it is not economically objective and fair since people compete with each other in the markets and if some people are prohibited from using pesticides in a way that other use pesticides, they will lose their target markets and it is not beneficial for them.
Second, despite the statement in the reading passage that by killing the fungus using heat it is possible to reserve more frogs, the speaker argues that it is too difficult to capture and treat every individual frog and use this medication and treatment on them. Moreover, this medication will not pass on their off-springs and so, it seems complicated and expensive.
Finally, the reading passage explains that as far as the frogs' natural habitats are endangered and imperiled especially by human activities, their population decreases. Conversely, the lecturer claims that human activity is not the main factor in diminishing frogs' population and the global warming features large in declining their population.
- It is more important to read and watch news presented by people whose opinion is different from your own view than by people whose opinion are similar to yours 85
- integrated writing 83
- University has 2 programs for students in break time between 2 semesters. Which one do you prefer?1) Taking some courses or classes which have no connection with your major,2) Take work project (working in city, or in school to teach children to overcome/ 86
- Do you agree or disagree,With the help of technology, students nowadays can learn more information and learn it more quickly? 76
- Which would you choose a higher pay job with long hours or an average pay job with normal work hours Explain your choice using specific reasons and details 93
Discourse Markers used:
['conversely', 'finally', 'first', 'if', 'moreover', 'second', 'so', 'in fact', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.241379310345 0.261695866417 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.159482758621 0.158904122519 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0862068965517 0.0723426182421 119% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0603448275862 0.0435111971325 139% => OK
Pronouns: 0.051724137931 0.0277247811725 187% => OK
Prepositions: 0.120689655172 0.128828473217 94% => OK
Participles: 0.051724137931 0.0370669169778 140% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.69061508868 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0215517241379 0.0208969081088 103% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.103448275862 0.128158765124 81% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0129310344828 0.0158828679856 81% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0129310344828 0.0114777025283 113% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1336.0 1645.83664459 81% => OK
No of words: 214.0 271.125827815 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.24299065421 6.08160592843 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 4.04852973271 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.38785046729 0.374372842146 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.322429906542 0.287516216867 112% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.200934579439 0.187439937562 107% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.154205607477 0.113142543107 136% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69061508868 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57476635514 0.539623497131 107% => OK
Word variations: 54.6328132804 53.8517498576 101% => OK
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0529801325 54% => OK
Sentence length: 30.5714285714 21.7502111507 141% => OK
Sentence length SD: 115.301910705 49.3711431718 234% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 190.857142857 132.220823453 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5714285714 21.7502111507 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.28571428571 0.878197800319 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 62.8144192256 50.5018328374 124% => OK
Elegance: 1.52380952381 1.90840788429 80% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.182671989419 0.142949733639 128% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0877988506323 0.0787303798458 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.76827324426 0.631733273073 122% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.134943502222 0.139662658121 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.309359918152 0.414875509568 75% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0614560433832 0.0530846634433 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 3.1766004415 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 6.0 10.2958057395 58% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.