integrated essay tpo 42
The reading mainly states that nowadays architectures sue more glass in many buildings which are so dangerous and harmful to birds, and he provides some reasons to solve this problem. However, the professor in the listing believes that these solutions are not effective and he rejects the author's view with bringing some reasons.
Firstly, the article asserts that people should apply more one-way glass in their buildings that birds cannot see in. However, the speaker argues that one-way glass can reflect outside such as a mirror that birds think this is sky or trees and try to fly through it. So this solution is not effective.
Secondly, in the passage section bring another solution that paints colorful lines can be effective that birds avoid it, people can use this design in their windows. On the contrary, the lecturer believes that this design will bring some problems such as darkness of the rooms the rooms and also birds try to fly into them due to this paints are actually small and birds cannot distinguish them.
Finally, the author discusses that magnetic field can be useful because birds use this natural ability too. On the other hand, the professor supports article’s idea related to birds use the magnetic field in their paths when the immigrate, but birds apply this way for traveling in long distant before starting winter in all over the world or between other cities, and for short trips, they fly by light and their eyes. This solution cannot be used too.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 268, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'the rooms'.
Suggestion: the rooms
...bring some problems such as darkness of the rooms the rooms and also birds try to fly into them due...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 331, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... also birds try to fly into them due to this paints are actually small and birds can...
^^^^
Line 6, column 230, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... the magnetic field in their paths when the immigrate, but birds apply this way for traveling...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1247.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 252.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94841269841 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27522878779 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.7280000991 49.2860985944 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.7 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 21.698381199 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06452816374 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.431493567597 0.272083759551 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165357243171 0.0996497079465 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778207606445 0.0662205650399 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243160404326 0.162205337803 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0961293946148 0.0443174109184 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 53.8541721854 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.