integrated essay TPO17
The reading illustrates theories about that thedeclination of the birds in US. The professor contradicts these theories by theses strong evidence.
Firstly, in the reading, it is said that because of the increasing the human populations, the bird territory has been disappeared. On the contrary, the lecture refutes the argument by stating that in the urban there is many number of habitants that are better and larger. So the professor disapproves this part of the argument with these kinds of evidence.
Secondly, even though the reading claims that the the growth of the agriculture will be menace for bird habitats, the professor argues in the lecturer that agriculture has been caused more foods are got access in Us and therefore, there is not any reason to destroy the wildness for this purpose.
Thirdly, although the passage says that the chemical pesticide implementation is another reason for the bird population reduction, the professor mentions an opposing view that since the most of the crops are pest resistant, therefore the applying the pesticides considerably have been reduced.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends 65
- integrated essay tpo 42 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. 90
- integrated essay TPO35 3
- integrated essay TPO 19 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 220, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'many numbers'.
Suggestion: many numbers
...t by stating that in the urban there is many number of habitants that are better and larger...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ly, even though the reading claims that the the growth of the agriculture will be menac...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ly, even though the reading claims that the the growth of the agriculture will be menac...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 1373.03311258 67% => OK
No of words: 175.0 270.72406181 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29142857143 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 4.04702891845 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88189280204 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 145.348785872 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 419.366225166 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 91.4078101428 49.2860985944 185% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.285714286 110.228320801 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 21.698381199 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4285714286 7.06452816374 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26964929011 0.272083759551 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0990195584823 0.0996497079465 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759493253306 0.0662205650399 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142443482247 0.162205337803 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614406963099 0.0443174109184 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.3589403974 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.