Do you agree or disagree?
Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
-interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
-Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader.
-say nothing.
even though many scholars and some of the students argue as if it is a general truth that at that time correct the mistakes of professors or teachers, I firmly recommend that students or people have to wait until the class or meeting ending after that correct some errors that happened. When the meeting is over, not only is the speaker can continue to his speech, but also students hold more respect to him. Addition, there are more times to talking about that. And believe it or not, this behavior is more valuable for students. I will elaborate my ideas with significant reasons in the following paragraphs.
One of the meaningful reasons coming to my mind at first is that when students are people are in an academic place, they should have a significantly behavior with some people that are around them exactly with their teachers or lectures who are teaching them. When a person makes some mistakes or talks something incorrect, audiences should be wait until meeting is finish and after that correct and discuss just with him more respectfully. For instance, I have been in a meeting of our university and my friend had a presentation, due to she had some stresses, she made some mistakes, after class I corrected her errors and she became happy.
Another my remarkable reason is that when you correct mistakes related to speaker in better situations and conditions that you have more times to argue and controvert about that problem. For example, my teacher used to correct and criticize my wrong answers when there are not no students in his office due to we can spend more and more times maybe one hours to take about mistakes. As you can see with this circumstance students have a lot of times to ask and take answer to their claims.
The last but not the least important reason is that if you want to correct speaker’s mistakes at that time, he will confuse and might cannot to continue his speech. For example, last year I was presenting my theses and one student asked a question about the method that I forged mention to, after that I could not focus on my material and in fact I did not have enough concentration.
As a result, based on all of the related reasons one can conclude that the best way of improving and reforming people’s mistakes is that we try found a better situation and suitable time to talk them, certainly after the meeting or presentation is over.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Even
even though many scholars and some of the st...
^^^^
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
even though many scholars and some of the students argue as if it is a general tr...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('significantly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('behavior') instead of another adjective.
... in an academic place, they should have a significantly behavior with some people that are around them e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'waited'?
Suggestion: waited
...omething incorrect, audiences should be wait until meeting is finish and after that ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 350, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one hour', 'an hour', or simply 'hours'?
Suggestion: one hour; an hour; hours
... we can spend more and more times maybe one hours to take about mistakes. As you can see ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 389, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ct I did not have enough concentration. As a result, based on all of the related...
^^^
Line 7, column 23, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...concentration. As a result, based on all of the related reasons one can conclude that t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, for example, for instance, in fact, talking about, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 11.0286738351 218% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1983.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6990521327 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58682802048 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483412322275 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 621.0 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.8462431381 48.9658058833 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.642857143 100.406767564 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1428571429 20.6045352989 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11675865481 0.236089414692 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466380696603 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416087177233 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0703292429047 0.150856017488 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0163944992574 0.0645574589148 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 11.7677419355 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.