integrated essay TPO35
The reading provides three hypothesizes to specify that what was the origin of Vynich manuscript in which its material was a difficult to understand. However, the lecturer refutes all the theories made in the reading passage and brings out counter proofs to clarify the issue.
To start out with, the first theory provided by the author is that Voynich manuscript is a sort of scientific work written in a complicated secret code. In addition, based on some similarity between demonstrated plants on Voynich manuscript and those in a book written by a sixteen-century scientist named Ascham, he has been known as its author probably. Nonetheless, the professor states that Ascham was a usual scientist whose publications was based on other scientific sources. Thus, he is not likely to be the author of such a secret manuscript.
Secondly, according to the article, Edward Kelly is assumed to be the aforementioned manuscript. He was a person who pretend to have magical power and wrote fake so-called magical books which did not have significant meaning to sell to the nobles. But, as the speaker says, though Kelly composed books in such a secret form, the people of sixteen century were easy to fool and there were not necessity to write a complex secret code.
Lastly, the reading posits that since Voynitch was an old book trader and was aware of these books' formation, therefore, the manuscript is created by himself indeed in order to present in profitable occasion. In a interesting way professor dismiss this idea by providing the fact that today they can date either vellum and ink on it. Hence, if Voynich wanted to create a fake manuscript, he could use vellum belonged to thousand years ago but never about the ink imprinted on the vellum.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. 81
- integrated essay TPO13 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 76
- Agree or disagree?For success in future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries. 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading provides three hypothesizes ...
^^
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
Suggestion: centuries
...ch a secret form, the people of sixteen century were easy to fool and there were not ne...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 94, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'books'' or 'book's'?
Suggestion: books'; book's
... old book trader and was aware of these books formation, therefore, the manuscript is...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 209, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "In a interesting way" with adverb for "interesting"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...rder to present in profitable occasion. In a interesting way professor dismiss this idea by providin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 212, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...r to present in profitable occasion. In a interesting way professor dismiss this ...
^
Line 4, column 420, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...script, he could use vellum belonged to thousand years ago but never about the ink impri...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, lastly, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, in addition, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 295.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98644067797 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77680713355 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 145.348785872 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586440677966 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2679541385 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.583333333 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5833333333 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06452816374 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.