Integrated - TPO-44
The passage brings three reasons to show that the coin which was found at a Native American site is fake. However, the professor states that these reasons might not be true.
First of all, the reading states that there was a great distance between the Norse settlements and the place where the coin was discovered. The lecturer, however, argues that Norse people used to travel to very far places. In these trips, they could have taken these coins to the Native American site.
Secondly, the reading mentions that no other coin has been discovered at the Norse settlements. The professor believes that this might be due to the fact that Norse people had taken those coins back to Europe (along with their other possessions).
Finally, the reading points out that North Americans had no use for silver coins and they were useless to them. The lecturer asserts this fact but mentions that North Americans used to be interested in unusual objects. Therefore, Norse people could trade these coins as long as they were both unusual and interesting to Native Americans.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 891.0 1373.03311258 65% => OK
No of words: 180.0 270.72406181 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2955875549 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 145.348785872 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561111111111 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 419.366225166 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.5212153043 49.2860985944 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.1 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.501450882464 0.272083759551 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.196325858389 0.0996497079465 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0917961330262 0.0662205650399 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.303410572991 0.162205337803 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444647128637 0.0443174109184 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.42419426049 85% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 63.6247240618 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.