The lecturer and the reading passage discuss the topic buzzing, which is a new type of advertisement or a tactic for selling more products.The lecturer casts doubt on several arguments that are presented in the reading passage.
For one thing, the lecturer challenges the reading passage by illustrating that although buzzers get paid by the company, buzzers a company hires are usually the people who have already bought the product and thought highly of the product. So it is a responsible behavior. This is the first obvious divergence where the lecturer disagrees with the passage.
In addition to that, the lecturer goes on to refute the passage by indicating that costumers are willing to ask buzzers questions about the price, the service, and the life expand of the product since they have experience of using the product. This shows the interest of consumers towards the product. As for this point, the passage asserts that it is the buzzers that make consumers believe in the power of the product, which could possibly deceive consumers. The passag believes that such behavior may even let consumers suffer a loss. So the assertion in the passage is not persuasive.
Furthermore, according to the lecturer, the lecturer counters the passage by announcing that buzzers are willing to share their experience of the product since they do have a good experience of the product, which appears to be a contradiction to the passage that buzzing perhaps jeopardise social relationships because one may not believe a person anymore once he realizes that the man is a buzzer. This is the last explicit point where the lecturer objects to the passage.
- Integrated writing - TPO 19 80
- TPO-13 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO 14 – task 1 73
- TPO 11 – task 1 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...t or a tactic for selling more products.The lecturer casts doubt on several argumen...
^^^
Line 6, column 428, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...ieve in the power of the product, which could possibly deceive consumers. The passag believes ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, may, so, as for, in addition, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09523809524 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73334697998 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509157509158 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 433.8 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 109.696124222 49.2860985944 223% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 126.454545455 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8181818182 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 7.06452816374 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273533899637 0.272083759551 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966018539425 0.0996497079465 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722117012521 0.0662205650399 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160309916402 0.162205337803 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719685020882 0.0443174109184 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.