The lecturer disputes the idea that the European silver coins discovered in the state of main in Canada were not original. He asserts that there are several reasons to make us believe that the coins were indeed original and have been brought from Europe by the Norse.
First, Archaeologists were able to discover other valuable historic peaces in the same location. The author claims that these coins were discovered far away from where the Norse have lived, this make us believe that they are not genuine. However, the lecturer states that there were other historic objects discovered in the same place. Moreover, the Norse did not stay in one location but they were travelling from one place to another.Therefore, finding them in far away places does not mean that they are not original.
Second, the lecturer suggests that the Norse use to take all their belongings when they traveled back to Europe. The author claims that since no other coins were found in the same location, that means that they are fake. On the other hand, the lecturer contends that the Norse settlers did not stay in North America all the time. He states that they use to go back to Europe and they use to collect all their things before they travel.
Finally, the lecturer argues that Native American would consider these coins as something valuable even though they cannot use them as money. The lecturer acknowledges that Native American are ignorant and know nothing about what was going in Europe at that time, however, he states that the native Americans might use these coins as nickles since they are beautiful peaces .Therefore, the Norse were sure that they will be able to trade them with the native American in return with something else.
- Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site. 76
- Some students like to work in groups with other students when doing assignments and projects. Other students prefer to work independently. Which do you prefer? 70
- Thus the project of sending humans to Mars would require solving an array of problems the Moon missions did not have to face. 3
- In some organisations, promotions are based on seniority, while in other organisations, promotions are based on performance.Discuss advantages of each position. Then indicate which position you think is best and why. 80
- Ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 436, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...re travelling from one place to another.Therefore, finding them in far away places does n...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 46, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...d, the lecturer suggests that the Norse use to take all their belongings when they ...
^^^
Line 3, column 350, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...erica all the time. He states that they use to go back to Europe and they use to co...
^^^
Line 3, column 384, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... they use to go back to Europe and they use to collect all their things before they...
^^^
Line 4, column 373, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... nickles since they are beautiful peaces .Therefore, the Norse were sure that they...
^^
Line 4, column 375, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...ickles since they are beautiful peaces .Therefore, the Norse were sure that they will be ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 22.412803532 192% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1437.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 295.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87118644068 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28690236698 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471186440678 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 465.3 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.7717642318 49.2860985944 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.75 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5833333333 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.397406871939 0.272083759551 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153276460721 0.0996497079465 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648203708354 0.0662205650399 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248821197426 0.162205337803 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472963317054 0.0443174109184 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.