“Let it burn” policy
Both the author and the lecturer discuss whether "let it burn" policy is a good plan or not. The passage claims that this policy has several harmful effects on the forest. The professor, on the other hand, completely rejects whatever mentioned in the reading through citing three reasons.
First, both the author and the professor talk about the effect of Yellowstone fires on the park's trees. According to the passage, these fires caused a huge damage to the park's trees and other plants. In addition, trees and other fauna were charred and covered from flames and smoke. The lecturer, nevertheless, rejects the author’s view and illustrates the idea that these fires help natural forests to their diversification and create the opportunity for other plants to grow.
Second of all, both the reading and the lecturer discuss the influence of these fires on the park’s wildlife. The author argues that these fires destroy the habitats of many kinds of animals. The professor validates the idea emphasizing that these fires, not only create an opportunity for other plants to grow, but they also help the forest to be an ideal habitat for animals.
Eventually, the passage and the lecture address the subject of tourist attraction. The passage goes on to mention that the fire damages the park, so the tourist season was cut short, and a large number of tourists decided to stay away. In contrast, the professor points out that fires do not have appear every year and annually, so they do not have a considerable effect on this matter.
All in all, the author mentions that these fires caused a huge impact on forests, the professor not only completely cast doubt on it, but she also demonstrates that these forests gain a significant benefit from the fire.
- The most effective ways for the government to conserve energy is to increase the price of gasoline and electricity 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In order to become financially responsible adults children should learn to manage their own money at young age 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 149, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'huge damage'.
Suggestion: huge damage
...ding to the passage, these fires caused a huge damage to the parks trees and other plants. In...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 187, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...o the tourist season was cut short, and a large number of tourists decided to stay away. In contr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 297, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'appeared'.
Suggestion: appeared
...essor points out that fires do not have appear every year and annually, so they do not...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in a significant benefit from the fire.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 297.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98316498316 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5307818253 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.55401593 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.714285714 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0737771809135 0.272083759551 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0322781056277 0.0996497079465 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0891946279795 0.0662205650399 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0563288253678 0.162205337803 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112657650736 0.0443174109184 254% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.