The main idea of both the reading and the lecture is about Robert Peary’s claim. The reading states that he reached the North Pole and presents three reasons. However, the professor asserts that this evidence is actually very uncertain. She refutes each of the reasons.
First, the reading claims that the National geographic committee checks his records and approved his alleged discovery. This argument challenged by the lecturer. She says that the National geographic investigation was not objective and It was a short inquiry. Furthermore, she argues that member of this committee was Peary’s friend and they cost a lot of money on his trip, so their inquiry is not reliable.
Second, the article states that Tom Avery imitated the Peary trip and Avery reached to North pole at the same time as Peary. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by asserting that Avery speed was different by Peary speed. She elaborates on this by mentioning that weather condition was good on Avery travel and his food received to him by a plane that these factors increased his travel speed.
Finally, It is stated in this article that Avery's photos are good evidence on his claim. The author establishes that by measuring shadows can prove that these pictures were taken in the North Pole. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that measuring method is a precise method but cannot use this method on these pictures. She puts forth the idea that we do not have exact location of the sun when these pics was taken and these pics are old and shadow in these images are vague and dimmed.
The main idea of both the reading and the lecture is about Robert peary’">peary’s claim. The reading states that he reached the north pole and presents three reasons. however, the professor asserts that this evidence is actually very uncertain. she refutes each of the reasons.
First, the reading claims that the national geographic committee checks his records and approved his alleged discovery. this argument challenged by the lecturer. she says that the national geographic investigation was not objective and it was a short inquiry. Furthermore, she argues that member of this committee was peary’">peary’s friend and they cost a lot of money on his trip, so their inquiry is not reliable.
Second, the article states that Tom avery imitated the peary trip and avery reached to north pole at the same time as peary. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by asserting that avery speed was different by peary speed. she elaborates on this by mentioning that weather condition was good on avery travel and his food received to him by a plane that these factors increased his travel speed.
Finally, it is stated in this article that avery's photos are good evidence on his claim. The author establishes that by measuring shadows can prove that these pictures were taken in the north pole. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that measuring method is a precise method but cannot use this method on these pictures. she puts forth the idea that we do not have exact location of the sun when these pics was taken and these pics are old and shadow in these images are vague and dimmed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... north pole and presents three reasons. however, the professor asserts that this eviden...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...is evidence is actually very uncertain. she refutes each of the reasons. First, th...
^^^
Line 2, column 120, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...rds and approved his alleged discovery. this argument challenged by the lecturer. sh...
^^^^
Line 2, column 162, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...is argument challenged by the lecturer. she says that the national geographic inves...
^^^
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...ery speed was different by peary speed. she elaborates on this by mentioning that w...
^^^
Line 4, column 326, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...nnot use this method on these pictures. she puts forth the idea that we do not have...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 22.412803532 201% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1351.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 269.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02230483271 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28904908236 2.5805825403 127% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53531598513 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1854343185 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0666666667 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73333333333 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.431475691469 0.272083759551 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154611372928 0.0996497079465 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148000215139 0.0662205650399 223% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.323993029678 0.162205337803 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.355122344357 0.0443174109184 801% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.