The main idea i both reading passage and lecture is presence of bees on earth before 200 million years ago. The skeptics in passage claims, there were no bees in that time. They give several arguments to support their claim. However, the lecturer refutes these reasons.
First, the writer states, there are no fossils of bees found that date. Earlist fossils discovered half that time. The froffesor refutes this reason. She mentions, Absence of fossils does not mean, there is no bee in that time. It mightbe, there is fossils, but it was not preserved, because we need specific liquid from trees to reserve fossils. Moreover, there were no trees in that time to preserve fossils.
In addition, the author asserts, absence of flowers before 200 milion years indicates that, there wre no bees. This is mainly because, bees feed on flowers. This argument is challenged by professor. She elaborates on non flower food like feruns that bees might feed on. Furthermore, when flowers grew, bees adapted themselves to feed on.
Finally, the author illustrates to lake of some details in fossilized structures which are found in Arizona like closed caps which present in chambers of recents bees and used as water approve. The professor contradicts this point. She states, there are another material is found in fossels champers. When researcher analized chemical structures of this material, it was the same as chemical as the spiral caps in chambers of bees to day.
The main idea i both reading passage and lecture is presence of bees on earth before 200 million years ago. The skeptics in passage claims, there were no bees in that time. They give several arguments to support their claim. However, the lecturer refutes these reasons.
First, the writer states, there are no fossils of bees found that date. Earlist fossils discovered half that time. The froffesor refutes this reason. She mentions, Absence of fossils does not mean, there is no bee in that time. It mightbe, there is fossils, but it was not preserved, because we need specific liquid from trees to reserve fossils. Moreover, there were no trees in that time to preserve fossils.
In addition, the author asserts, absence of flowers before 200 milion years indicates that, there wre no bees. This is mainly because, bees feed on flowers. This argument is challenged by professor. She elaborates on non flower food like feruns that bees might feed on. Furthermore, when flowers grew, bees adapted themselves to feed on.
Finally, the author illustrates to lake of some details in fossilized structures which are found in Arizona like closed caps which present in chambers of recents bees and used as water approve. The professor contradicts this point. She states, there are another material is found in fossels champers. When researcher analized chemical structures of this material, it was the same as chemical as the spiral caps in chambers of bees to day.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-20 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
- The passage and lecture are both about Agnostids which were a group of marine animals that extinict about 450 million years ago The passages claims that there are several different theories about how agnostids may have lived The lecturer casts doubt on cl 80
- The reading passage and the lecture are both talking about computerize smart cars The writer claims several benefits by using this type of cars However the professor casts doubt on claim made in article She believes using computerize cars is not clear ben 78
- The passage and lecture about the effectiveness of eco certification that wood companies in united states might do The writer cliams several reasons explain this certification on wood companies is not effective The lecturer in the other hand casts doubt o 73
- The writing passage and lecture are both about propabillty of extinction of rhinoceros horn due to illegal sale by poachers The author of article demonsterates three ideas to save rhinocerose horn from extinction the lecturer casts doubt on claims made in 80
- World today faces a lot of changes in all parts of life The question is whether this guick change make people less or more happy This will be weighed in many different aspects Admittedly some believe development which happened in our society make them les 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fesor refutes this reason. She mentions, Absence of fossils does not mean, there ...
^^
Line 2, column 243, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[3]
Message: Did you mean 'there are fossils'?
Suggestion: there are fossils
...ere is no bee in that time. It mightbe, there is fossils, but it was not preserved, because we n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssor contradicts this point. She states, there are another material is found in f...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1221.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 243.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02469135802 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44612736681 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58024691358 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 21.2450331126 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7852963555 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 64.2631578947 110.228320801 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.7894736842 21.698381199 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.78947368421 7.06452816374 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.418822520632 0.272083759551 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122093222759 0.0996497079465 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.151053889593 0.0662205650399 228% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.299188146894 0.162205337803 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.344604138996 0.0443174109184 778% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.3589403974 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.76 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.0289183223 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.95 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.7273730684 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.498013245 65% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.