Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes; similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods. The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy products has a number of social benefits.
Both the reading passage and lecture discuss countries' new decisions. The country decided to give high taxes to cigarette smokers. High taxes for purchases of cigarettes, also they want to give high taxes for unhealthy foods. The article states that it would be beneficial for society and mentions three benefits for this idea. However, the professor disagrees with these benefits.
First, the passage claims that the taxes can disappoint people from buying people and they get forced to buy fewer cigarettes and this can have an effect on society's health problem and decrease it. the lecturer refutes this idea by saying that with this decision the smoke rate does not decline, the people who smoke buy cheaper cigarettes with low quality and it is harmful and has high risks for users. Also, people who buy unhealthy food keep doing it and buy unhealthy food with higher costs and they cannot spend money on healthy food.
Second, the article posits that it is a kind of fairway. People that use smoking and unhealthy foods get sick and create lots of medical costs, so it is unfair that other people contribute equally to covering these costs. However, the professor disagrees with this idea and says that high taxes are unfair too. Addicted People to smoking are both people with high or low incomes should pay these taxes so these taxes are not fair because addicted people with smaller incomes should pay.
Finally, the reading passage states that the high taxes on cigarettes increases revenue for the government and the government can use these taxes on medical assistance or for different beneficial projects. In contrast, the professor states that the governments can use these tax revenues for various projects have a downside. This income represents millions and millions of dollars, and governments don’t want to lose it. For example, they are likely to adopt radical measures such as not allowing smoking in outdoor public areas such as parks, or even banning smoking in all outdoor areas public or private, because they don't want to lose this income.
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion which of the following is the best thing to do Interrupt and correct the mistake right away Wait until the class or meeting is over 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project 70
- Throughout the world s oceans hard structures such as natural reefs provide ideal marine habitats Reefs provide hard surfaces to which plants coral and sponges can attach and thereby provide food and shelter for many types of fish Recently workers in the 70
- Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays 73
- Because of climate change more and more land that was once used to grow crops or provide food for animals is turning to dry unusable desert land There are many proposals about how to stop this process known as desertification A number of proposals involve 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 622, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...r areas public or private, because they dont want to lose this income. ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se they dont want to lose this income.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, for example, in contrast, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 7.30242825607 260% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1739.0 1373.03311258 127% => OK
No of words: 344.0 270.72406181 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05523255814 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31338188277 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491279069767 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 526.5 419.366225166 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.187701396 49.2860985944 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.6875 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301453335635 0.272083759551 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111183595345 0.0996497079465 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109073589774 0.0662205650399 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204779900122 0.162205337803 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0830779885611 0.0443174109184 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.