In many organizations perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages First of all a group of people has a wider range of knowledge exper

Essay topics:

In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team.

Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people has a wider range of knowledge, expertise, and skills than any single individual is likely to possess. Also, because of the numbers of people involved and the greater resources they possess, a group can work more quickly in response to the task assigned to it and can come up with highly creative solutions to problems and issues. Sometimes these creative solutions come about because a group is more likely to make risky decisions that an individual might not undertake. This is because the group spreads responsibility for a decision to all the members and thus no single individual can be held accountable if the decision turns out to be wrong.

Taking part in a group process can be very rewarding for members of the team. Team members who have a voice in making a decision will no doubt feel better about carrying out the work that is entailed by the decision than they might doing work that is imposed on them by others. Also, the individual team member has a much better chance to "shine", to get his or her contributions and ideas not only recognized but recognized as highly significant, because a team's overall results can be more far-reaching and have greater impact than what might have otherwise been possible for the person to accomplish or contribute working alone.

Firstly, According to reading passage working with team provides with wider range of skills, knowledge and expertise leading to creative solutions for completing task. while, lecture comments that even after six months when company evaluated the work done by different teams it was found that many of the members did not contributed much and task was still incomplete.
Secondly, the reading passage claims that working in team enhances chances for individuals to get regconition for his or her significant contribution. on the other hand, in lecture this point is mentioned exactly opposite, no individual names were recognized. Instead, whole group was recognized.
Thirdly, according to passage by involving people with greater resourses in group, a group can work more efficiency and task assigned can be completed within time frame alloted. As opposed to this, in lecture working in team is considered as time consuming. Giving an example of influencers, one or more influencers in group always try to move project at their pace and if plan deviate, idea is dropped adding to time.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-03 sefeliz 76 view
2023-06-21 宋致遠 view
2023-06-14 Simin_MB 65 view
2022-10-24 Sumilak 70 view
2022-10-02 Sakib 73 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Sukhi26 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...creative solutions for completing task. while, lecture comments that even after six m...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 322, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'contribute'
Suggestion: contribute
... found that many of the members did not contributed much and task was still incomplete. Se...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iduals to get regconition for his or her significant contribution. on the other h...
^^
Line 2, column 152, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...r his or her significant contribution. on the other hand, in lecture this point i...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 1373.03311258 67% => OK
No of words: 173.0 270.72406181 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29479768786 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 4.04702891845 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77918690429 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.71098265896 0.540411800872 132% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 419.366225166 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.912787442 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.75 7.06452816374 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158410556768 0.272083759551 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628507752689 0.0996497079465 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0339013472266 0.0662205650399 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0966578200431 0.162205337803 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038639914436 0.0443174109184 87% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:

para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3

Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).

Don't need a conclusion paragraph.

Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.