Many people have a close relationship with their pets. These people treat their birds, cats, or other animals like members of their family. In your opinion, are such relationships good? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans

Doubtless, majority of people love pets. They affect in many parts of our lives. Some people even consider their pets for family members and it means that they achieved the greatest trust of people. I am sure these relationships are good and I will try to display some reasons for my point.

Firstly, pets help people to become calmer. Pets, such as dogs and cats understand our feelings and our mood. If they see that you are sad or crying, they will definitely try to comfort you. Pets help us to release our pressure that builds up from our professional commitments, for example stroking cats is thought to be a good way of calming down.

Secondly, a lot of pets need attention and taking care of them. For instance, dogs need 2 hour walk outside. This activity not only makes your dog happier, but also improves your health. Spending more time on fresh air greatly promotes fitness. You can also do some other sports with your dog, such as the running, cycling and etc. Also, pets can do even more. They feel such catastrophes as earthquakes, tornados, tsunamis and the like. Your close friend can predict it and someday save your life

Furthermore, one should not forget, that pets help invalids. The dog can be the leader for a blind person. That people almost live by their pets and don’t imagine their life without the closest friends. Moreover, people in mountains use dogs for transportation and they are irreplaceable.

From these arguments one can conclude, that pets play a major role in our life. They make your life more colorful, happier and healthy, and I think that pets affect our behavior only positively, so these relationships are good.

Votes
Average: 8.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
... your dog, such as the running, cycling and etc. Also, pets can do even more. They feel ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, i think, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 22.412803532 201% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 288.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82638888889 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52346243371 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604166666667 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 3.25607064018 338% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.5675584873 49.2860985944 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 66.1904761905 110.228320801 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.7142857143 21.698381199 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06452816374 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 4.33554083885 254% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211605033582 0.272083759551 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604189301733 0.0996497079465 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520253986798 0.0662205650399 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119574476516 0.162205337803 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046808183639 0.0443174109184 106% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.3589403974 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 53.8541721854 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 11.0289183223 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.14 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.