Based on the given materials, the article as well as the lecture discusses the possibility of having a human station on Venus. The reading asserts that because of the harsh enviroment of the planet it is impossible to have a station there. The lecturer propouse a floating station fifty kilometer above the surface to repudiate this claim.
Initially, it is alleged in the reading that on Venuss' surface the pressure is so much more than earth that no station can tolerate it and as a result will be crashed within an hour. However, the lecturer alludes to the fact that as we go up the pressure dropes. Fifty kilometer above the surface the pressure equals to the earth and consequently it would have no harm to the station.
Second, the writer proclaims that Venus' atmosphere is made up of carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and sulfuric asid but there is not any water or oxygen and these elements should be supplied from earth which is not easy. Yet again, the speaker underscores that chemical processes can provide the basic water and oxygen for humans to survive there by materials which are obtained from atmosphere. So its not needed to import them from earth.
The final point of contention between the listening and the reading passages is a thick layer of clouds which blockes the sunlight. The author explains that since the light can not reach the surface, solar power pannels will have no use as they can not produce energy. On the other hand, the listening mentions that fifty kilometer above the surface of the planet, allbeit there exist cloud but they are not dense enough to blocks the light completely and implementation of solar pannels are possible. He claims that not only the panels can use the light from above but also can generates electrisity by the use of reflection from clouds too which proved more than the need of the station.
- In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States—birds in particular. Unfortunately for birds, these trends are likely t 80
- The zebra mussel, a freshwater shellfish native to Eastern Europe, has long been spreading out from its original habitats and has now reached parts of North America. There are reasons to believe that this invasion cannot be stopped and that it poses a ser 83
- In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s not to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fires would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much damage. However, in the summer of 1 60
- A huge marine mammal known as Steller’s sea cow once lived in the waters around Bering Island off the coast of Siberia. It was described in 1741 by Georg W. Steller, a naturalist who was among the first Europeans to see one. In 1768 the animal became ex 80
- TPO-25 - Independent Writing Task 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kilometer' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kilometers'.
Suggestion: kilometers
...turer propouse a floating station fifty kilometer above the surface to repudiate this cla...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 580, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'generate'
Suggestion: generate
...n use the light from above but also can generates electrisity by the use of reflection fr...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, second, so, well, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 321.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79750778816 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44473469119 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520249221184 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8565385628 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.461538462 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6923076923 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0835005897584 0.272083759551 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0303340619607 0.0996497079465 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0332534004927 0.0662205650399 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0521386113759 0.162205337803 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234954247128 0.0443174109184 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.