Many studies have found sucralose to be perfectly safe for people to consume. And it is useful for people who are trying to lose weight. The reading’s arguments against using sucralose can all be changed.
First, about sucralose affecting the thymus. If you look closely at the studies of sucralose consumption, there were no effects on the rats at all until they were eating extremely large quantities of sucralose. In order for a human to eat the equivalent amounts that affected the rats being studied, a human would have to consume about 4000 packets of sucralose per day for a month.
Second, sure, some organ chlorines are toxic. If they are consumed, they are digested and stored in fat tissue, and they continue to build up in the fat tissues till they reach toxic levels. But studies show sucralose is a bit different from the other organ chlorines. Sucralose is not absorbed by the digestive system very well and so it does not accumulate in the body’s fat tissue. Since sucralose is not absorbed well by the digestive system and doesn’t build up to dangerous levels in fat tissue, it is unlikely to have the toxic effect that the other organ chlorines do.
Finally, there is the argument that many people who use artificial sweeteners in their drinks end up eating lots of real sugar in food like cake, and so they negate the benefits of using the sweetener. Well, that argument may hold true for many artificial sweeteners but sucralose has a unique property that makes it different. Most artificial sweeteners break down if they are heated too much, but sucralose does not break down when heated. That means that unlike other sweeteners, sucralose can be used to bake things, like cakes and cookies, for example. People craving something sweet can turn to cakes or cookies baked with sucralose, which helps them keep their diets on track.
The article disscuses about the suralose which is an artificial sweetener and its danger for the body. In the lecture, the professor makes a series of points that cast doubt on all the arguments presented in the reading passage. He states many studies showed that sucrolose is perfectly useful for people and is also safe.
First of all, he states that effecting in mice thymus which is pointed in the article is dependent on the dose. He clarifies that no effect was seen on the rat unless they used extreme amounts of sucralose. For having effect on thymus if we equivalent the amount for human, people have to use 4000 packets per day for one month which is not possible and reasonable and nobody uses them this much.
Also, the lecturer states organoclorines as the reading says are toxic for the body and accumulate in fat tissues but sucralose act differently and does not make any danger. In contrast of the idea presented in the reading, clorine in sucrolose has different characteristic to other forms which are toxic for the body. In fact, sucrolose does not absorb by digestive system and hence does not accumluate in the body. So,There is no build up in fat tissue and harm for the body.
Lastly, the professor states for other artificial sweetener using them may crave people to use more sweets and cakes but sucrolose do not break down when heated. Therefore, people can use it in cakes and sweets and be still on their diet and be on track and lose their weight. In contrary,use of other sweetener may encourage people to eat sweet more, which has lots of sugur and make them obese. In fact, other artificial sweetener will breakdown when are heated and do not have this capability.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-23 | Springlovers | 80 | view |
- TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems 75
- TOEFL integrated writing: Altruism 3
- Governments should spend more money in sponsoring arts than in athletics (like state Olympics team). 60
- Causes of Worldwide Land Degradation 73
- TPO-44 - Integrated Writing Task In 1957 a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native American archaeological site in the state of Maine in the United States. Many people believed the coin had been originally brought to 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 179, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun amount seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of amounts'.
Suggestion: a lot of amounts
...ct was seen on the rat unless they used a lot of amount of them. For having effect on thymus pe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 329, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'nobody' must be used with a third-person verb: 'uses'.
Suggestion: uses
... not possible and reasonable and nobody use them this much. Also, the lecturer ref...
^^^
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...e effect of sucrolose on fat tissue. In contrast of the idea presented in the reading, c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 307, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , There
... hence do not accumluate in the body. So,There is no build up in fat tissue and harm f...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 282, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , use
...be on track and lose weight. In contrary,use of other sweetener may encourage people...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, lastly, may, so, still, therefore, in contrast, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1247.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60147601476 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40083340423 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523985239852 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7402157264 49.2860985944 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.0714285714 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265184161807 0.272083759551 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904946828858 0.0996497079465 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874137957894 0.0662205650399 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15900481527 0.162205337803 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733290122145 0.0443174109184 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 12.2367328918 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.