Marketing strategy for big companies should be placed on offer and discounts, and in what ways this can impact on their reputation?
In this day and age, marketing methods for selling goods or offering services have become a controversial debate among public around the world. Although even offering discounts is regarded as thoroughly both destructive and negative by a considerable number of people, the others held the opposing view. I am inclined to highly believe that advertising for sell is beneficial and could develop positive characteristics in the society.
There are various reasons why I believe that offering discount as a way of marketing is advantageous. First and foremost, advertisement plays a pivotal role to introduce new born products, which is argued endlessly nowadays. This may be attributed to the fact that people have a growing tendency to buy new things or employ new services and this surely creates a sense of accomplishment and competence, which is consequently open avenue to new achievements. From my own experience as an educated person, contributing in the marketing, as a seller or buyer, brought about a significant development in countries economy. Therefore, the profitable influences of foregoing matters are undeniable.
However, there is no doubt that wrong and weak policies to ban huge firms from manipulating can lead to negative consequences, and it can devitalize society with countless variables, which inevitably leads to untrustworthy sense among people. For instance, research conducted by Harvard University researchers in 2010 have shown that inflation is inversely correlated with manipulated societies by companies. Hence, the drawbacks are obvious, and they can potentially impose irreparable impacts on a country.
To conclude, weighing all arguments up against each other, I strongly agree the positive side and valid points of the new methods for selling. Although most of advertisements has its adverse effects on people to buy, it can inform us by acceptable information that regarded as a prominent feature of globalisation.
- In the past, people ate food that was better for their health than they do today. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some adults believe that nowadays children’s behavior is worse than children’s behavior was in the past. These adults have suggested three actions that parents can do to help children ages 5–10 behave better (for example, by speaking more respectful 80
- In the past people ate food that was better for their health than they do today. 3 70
- Whether travel is a necessary component of a quality education. Discuss and give your own experience. 70
- In the past people ate food that was better for their health than they do today. 4 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 354, Rule ID: FOR_SELL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for sale'?
Suggestion: for sale
...ined to highly believe that advertising for sell is beneficial and could develop positiv...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 153, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the advertisements') or simply say ''most advertisements''.
Suggestion: most of the advertisements; most advertisements
...f the new methods for selling. Although most of advertisements has its adverse effects on people to bu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, for instance, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 300.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55333333333 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2644482263 2.5805825403 127% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 145.348785872 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653333333333 0.540411800872 121% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 419.366225166 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6193194582 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.153846154 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152747872447 0.272083759551 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478457803998 0.0996497079465 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044242595775 0.0662205650399 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0802370650323 0.162205337803 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253175445272 0.0443174109184 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.3589403974 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.8541721854 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.2367328918 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.42419426049 125% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 63.6247240618 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.