This material addresses the question of whether the researchers found actual tissues of Tyrannosaurus rex. The reading passage suggests three arguments to support the view that the leg bone of the dinosaur contained remains of blood vessels, red blood cells, and collagen. The lecturer refutes this information by stating that the found material is something else.
This material addresses the question of whether the researchers found actual tissues of Tyrannosaurus rex. The reading passage suggests three arguments to support the view that the leg bone of the dinosaur contained remains of blood vessels, red blood cells, and collagen. The lecturer, on the other hand, refutes this information by stating that the found material is something else.
To begin with, the reading passage highlights that the soft substance found in the bone may be the remains of the dinosaur's blood vessels. Meanwhile, the professor casts doubt on this and argues that the corresponding material may be the residues of bacteria’s colonies, as bacteria may have filled the space after the animal's death.
Additionally, the article posits that the spheres discovered in the bone might be the remains of red blood cells. However, the professor advocates a different approach and provides the following details. Namely, he mentions that similar spheres were found in the fossils of primitive animals - a fact, that undermines the validity of the mentioned argument, since the primitive animals are proved not to have red blood vessels.
Finally, the author invites attention to the fact that the dinosaur's leg bone contained collagen, which is associated with bone tissue. This goes counter to the information in the listening passage, according to which, collagen does not last longer than 100,000 years which was not the case. The professor suggests that collagen may have originated form skin of the researchers who found the bone.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-20 | Shayooooon | 80 | view |
- TPO 41 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Young people devote less time to helping their communities nowadays than were they in past. 70
- The professor controverts all the points that have been made by the author of the reading passage, he also discredits all the main arguments presented in the reading by providing rational reasons. The reading discusses about the wood companies that conser 3
- TPO 40: Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 25, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
This material addresses the question of whether the researchers found actual tissues of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 324, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...ria may have filled the space after the animals death. Additionally, the article posit...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, may, so, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1311.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 246.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32926829268 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73771037661 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540650406504 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2276579334 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.181818182 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3636363636 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 7.06452816374 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.49732900001 0.272083759551 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183574368324 0.0996497079465 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.182307193268 0.0662205650399 275% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.306352791324 0.162205337803 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.260418694676 0.0443174109184 588% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.