Measures to control spread of cane toad in Australia
Reading and Writing are about different measures to control spread of cane toad in Australia. More specifically, in regard to passages, the author is of the opinion that these measures will play a vital role in controlling their population, and supports his position by providing three arguments. The speaker is quick to point out that there are some serious flaws in the arguments made in reading text as these measures will be ineffective in controlling the spread of cane toads, and address, in detail trouble with each of them.
First of all, author mentions that building a national fence will prevent spreading of cane toads to other areas which they have still not explored. Further, he adds that same technique was used earlier to control spread of rabbits. Nevertheless, the speaker contends this argument by revealing that building a national fence will not be able to stop young toads and eggs to reach different places as they are normally found in rivers and streams. Next, he explains that even a few of their young toads and eggs are enough to further colonize that area.
Secondly, the author claims that we can have volunteers capture and kill the population of cane toads. Yet, the speaker contradicts this claim by pointing out that volunteers used will be inexperienced and they can catch and kill other species of frogs which are natural habitat of Australia. He elaborates it further by stating that young ones of Australian native frog looks just same as cane toad young ones.
Finally, the author wraps up his argument by positing that researchers are working on a virus which can help to control their population as it will prevent these frogs from maturing and reproducing. Not surprisingly, in contrast to author’s point, the speaker suggest that Australian reptiles are many times transported to other continents and if this virus reaches there with these reptiles and it can affect the cane toad in those central and southern America regions where they are the native species and can eliminate them. As a result, the whole eco-system will suffer in those areas.
To sum up, the author and the speaker have conflicting views regarding measure to control spread of cane toads. It is clear that they will have trouble finding a common ground on this.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-18 | panizzf | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | jason_linnil | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | JohnSmith96 | 81 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | JohnSmith96 | 83 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | JohnSmith96 | 73 | view |
- Measures to control spread of cane toad in Australia 83
- In many places, students aged 12-18 are typically taught different subjects by different teachers while younger students are usually taught by only one teacher all day long. However, it would also benefit younger students to be taught by several different 73
- Comics being an art form unique to America 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment—doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Driverless cars 93
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, look, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, in contrast, as a result, first of all, in contrast to, in regard to, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 22.412803532 192% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 30.3222958057 171% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1919.0 1373.03311258 140% => OK
No of words: 383.0 270.72406181 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01044386423 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.04702891845 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58483002334 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 145.348785872 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488250652742 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 570.6 419.366225166 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.9290675169 49.2860985944 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.933333333 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5333333333 21.698381199 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6 7.06452816374 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347170413259 0.272083759551 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134912575168 0.0996497079465 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.160069112375 0.0662205650399 242% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206936891507 0.162205337803 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122407765263 0.0443174109184 276% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 63.6247240618 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.