Moai construction
Author of the passage and professor are concerned about the consequences of the Moai construction in Island. While passage states 3 reasons for the same, professor argues the validity of these reasons.
Firstly, passage states that people of island used aforementioned tracks for construction of the Moai. It also states that trees were cut for the same and eventually leads to deforestation in Island.But professor argues the validity by stating that aforementioned tracks were not used for the construction rather ropes were used to build it. In addition to his argument, professor states that modern research has performed a demo for the same using a real Moai construction.
Secondly, professor refutes the possibility of deforestation because of the Moai by stating giving another explanation for the same. Professor explains that when the island was visited for the first time, there were numerous trees but it eventually decreased. Thus, decrease in the number of trees can be due to that visit. By scrunitizing the island, it is found that deforestation was because of rats. Moreover, rats were brought with the visitors for the food purpose so it can be inferred that deforestation was because of visitors.
Thirdly, passage states that there was a mass die off after the construction of Moai. Deforestation was the main reason because it declined the birds coming to Island which were the food for those people. Moreover, decline in the fish also affects the food. Thus, this reasoning is centred towards the deforestation. But professor refutes this possibility by stating numbers and states that from carbon dating it can be said that 2000 is the maximum number of people which can be possible on Island.
Thus, professor invalidates all the arguments given in the passage with proper justification.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-19 | valerii | 3 | view |
| 2016-08-13 | dhrumil2910 | 76 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
...tually leads to deforestation in Island.But professor argues the validity by statin...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'moreover', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly', 'thus', 'while', 'in addition']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.26875 0.261695866417 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.175 0.158904122519 110% => OK
Adjectives: 0.046875 0.0723426182421 65% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0375 0.0435111971325 86% => OK
Pronouns: 0.025 0.0277247811725 90% => OK
Prepositions: 0.16875 0.128828473217 131% => OK
Participles: 0.0625 0.0370669169778 169% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.93144283633 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Infinitives: 0.015625 0.0208969081088 75% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.121875 0.128158765124 95% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0125 0.0158828679856 79% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.009375 0.0114777025283 82% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1820.0 1645.83664459 111% => OK
No of words: 292.0 271.125827815 108% => OK
Chars per words: 6.23287671233 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.04852973271 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.380136986301 0.374372842146 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.287671232877 0.287516216867 100% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.188356164384 0.187439937562 100% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.140410958904 0.113142543107 124% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93144283633 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47602739726 0.539623497131 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 46.194521137 53.8517498576 86% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0529801325 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.25 21.7502111507 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9707362759 49.3711431718 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.75 132.220823453 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 21.7502111507 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.875 0.878197800319 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 47.0171232877 50.5018328374 93% => OK
Elegance: 2.10526315789 1.90840788429 110% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115473176974 0.549887131256 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.147764609535 0.142949733639 103% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.091267344552 0.0787303798458 116% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.633552701662 0.631733273073 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.157322296743 0.139662658121 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687015809685 0.266732575781 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103115813519 0.103435571967 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.445984521435 0.414875509568 107% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.128851897366 0.0530846634433 243% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0860341072456 0.40443939384 21% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712653557773 0.0528353158467 135% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.26048565121 188% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 3.1766004415 189% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.2958057395 136% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.