n the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s not to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fires would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much damage. However, in the summer of 1988, forest fires in Yellowstone, the most famous national park in the country, burned for more than two months and spread over a huge area, encompassing more than 800,000 acres. Because of the large scale of the damage, many people called for replacing the “let it burn” policy with a policy of extinguishing forest fires as soon as they appeared. Three kinds of damage caused by the “let it burn” policy were emphasized by critics of the policy.
First, Yellowstone fires cause tremendous damage to the parks trees and other vegetation. When the fires finally died out, nearly one third of Yellowstone’s land had been scorched. Trees were charred and blackened from flames and smoke. Smaller plants were entirely incinerated. What had been a national treasure now seemed like a devastated wasteland.
Second, the park wildlife was affected as well. Large animals like deer and elk were seen fleeing the fire. Many smaller species were probably unable to escape. There was also concern than the destruction of habitats and the disruption of food chains would make it impossible for the animals that survived the fire to return.
Third, the fires compromised the value of the park as a tourist attraction, which in turn had negative consequences for the local economy. With several thousand acres of the park engulfed in flames, the tourist season was cut short, and a large number of visitors decided to stay away. Of course, local businesses that depended on park visitors suffered as a result.
The aticle and the lecturer are both about natural forest fires and let it burn policy. The author of the reading thinks that let it burn policy is not good for the plants, animals and tuarisom in yellowstone park. The lecturer challengers the calims made by the author. He thinks that let it burn policy didn't effect on plants, animals and visitors who come to visit this park.
First of all, the author argues that yellowstone fires caused huge damage to the park's trees and vegetation. The article is mention that nearly one third of the park land was burnt and effected because of the fire. This point is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that though the trees burnt because of the fire, it was a great chance to grow new small pland which eas a problem to grow in big shades. Furthermore, he says that the seed wich they want more heat to grow, they grow very fast.
Secondly, the author suggests that this fire kills lot of animal in the park. The article notes that the fire ditroy the animal habitats as well. The lecturer rebusts this argument. He suggest that newly grown plants were become good foods for the small animas like rabbits and hairs. He elborate on this by mentioning that becaues of that it duild up more food chains.
Finally, the author states that this disaster declind the visiters who come to visit the park. In contast, the leecture's position is that this fire does not happen evey year. It happened because of less rain and strong wind of those days. It happened only once there for after the fire again tourist started comming to visit the park.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign country. 60
- Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed 55
- successful people try new things and take risks rather than doing what they already know how to do well 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most advertisements make products seem much better then they really are.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...imals and tuarisom in yellowstone park. The lecturer challengers the calims made by...
^^^
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...thor. He thinks that let it burn policy didnt effect on plants, animals and visitors ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 186, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'suggests'.
Suggestion: suggests
... The lecturer rebusts this argument. He suggest that newly grown plants were become goo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, second, secondly, so, third, well, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1316.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 284.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6338028169 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.07939454417 2.5805825403 81% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538732394366 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 3.25607064018 307% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.5071820027 49.2860985944 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.1111111111 110.228320801 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7777777778 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 7.06452816374 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0976862324446 0.272083759551 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0342840880562 0.0996497079465 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544229953652 0.0662205650399 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0633146486862 0.162205337803 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649509885029 0.0443174109184 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.3589403974 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 53.8541721854 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.0289183223 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 12.2367328918 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.42419426049 86% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.