the new regulations for handling and storge coal ash
The material discusses the new stricter rules that the US should adopt for handling and storing coal ash. While the reading looks at the topic from one perspective, the listening challenges certain points outlined in the reading passage.
First, the author claims that these regulations already exist. On the other hand, the professor opposes that and says these rules should be updated because the old rule of using liner special material is not sufficient. The lecturer adds that the current regulation use this liner for only new landfills or new ponds, but do not use it in the old disposal sites. The listening mentions that it causes leaking of harmful chemical material into groundwater and contaminates the drinking water. As a result, these rules should be active in both old and new disposal sites.
Second, the reading posits that these stricter rules could discourage consumers from using coal ash recycle material. On the contrary, the lecturer contradicts this and points that these rules will never affect consuming recycle materials because other old danger materials, such as mercury, have used this approach and has continued to recycle for fifty years, and consumers do not have any concerns, even though the stricter handle rules.
Third, the author states that these stricter regulations will increase the cost of power. In contrast, the professor challenges this and says that it is true the cost of power will increase; however, the result is well-worthy. The lecturer explains that the cost of power companies will be fifteen billion dollars, but analyzes that mathematically reveal that a house's electric bill will just increase one percent, which is not a high price to pay for having a clean environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 481, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to pay for having a clean environment.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, second, so, third, well, while, in contrast, such as, as a result, it is true, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18505338078 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55642372032 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537366548043 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.9829302642 49.2860985944 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.416666667 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06452816374 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203075239532 0.272083759551 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812088887371 0.0996497079465 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102171541877 0.0662205650399 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126081590631 0.162205337803 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065018345942 0.0443174109184 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.