nkldfngkler
Both the lecturer and the article are discussing the appearances of professors on TV and its advantages and disadvantages. The article claims that professors as well as universities and society get something useful from such events. However, the lecturer states that no one really benefit from TV shows and for scholars it can even result in bad consequences.
First and foremost, in the article it was said that it's a good practice for teachers to participate in TV programs. It can improve their reputation within other scholars and make more people engaged into his or her ideas and investigations. However, the lecturer has an opposite opinion. She is assured that TV shows can cause damage to the reputation of the scholars. They can even be ignored during valuable meetings and conferences. Consequently, it will become a tough call to ask for money to make investigations. One more point, is that TV shows are very time-consuming. Professors need to spend time on the preparations and on the travel itself instead of having lectures with students.
Secondly, the article says that public is interested in science and such programs are informative and captivating for them, considering the fact that they don't have an opportunity to meet with scholars personally. Nevertheless, the lecturer claims that listeners don't really benefit from shows. TV programs don't like to create and broadcast a very deep and detailed information, wich is important for science. All such programs contain are academic titles and background material related to the talk.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-23 | Llsnxbdjzbbab263646 | 3 | view |
- nbjdhfgoidsjkopq w 3
- Do you agree with the following statement To succeed in school or work the ability to adapt to changing conditions or circumstances is more important than excellent knowledge in a job or a field of study 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement that it is always right for governments to ask people to move their businesses and houses to provide space for the construction of large structures new roads new dams etc 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People who have had difficulty learning a skill go on to become better teachers of that skill yhan people who learned it easily Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- nkldfngkler 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 53, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...remost, in the article it was said that its a good practice for teachers to partici...
^^^
Line 5, column 156, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...or them, considering the fact that they dont have an opportunity to meet with schola...
^^^^
Line 5, column 264, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ess, the lecturer claims that listeners dont really benefit from shows. TV programs ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 308, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... really benefit from shows. TV programs dont like to create and broadcast a very dee...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, nevertheless, really, second, secondly, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 7.30242825607 219% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1312.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 251.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22709163347 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0529420615 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569721115538 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5584693103 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.4666666667 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7333333333 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.