Nothing
The reading and the lecture are both about the Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet. The author of the reading believes this painting is not the work of Rembrandt. The lecturer challenges the statements made by the author. She is of the opinion that none of these theories is correct.
First of all, the author suggests that the fur collar in the painting does not match clothing typical of a servant, a detail that Rembrandt would not have overlooked. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. He says that the fur collar was added later in an attempt to increase the painting's value
Secondly, the writer contends that the light and shadow appear incorrectly in the painting. The article, however, notes that Rembrandt was a master of painting light and shadow. The lecturer rebuts this by asserting that the light and the shadow appeared incorrectly because of the fur collar that was added later. Once the fur collar was removed, revealing the original white collar, the light and shadow appeared correctly.
Finally, it is stated in the article that the portrait was painted on multiple wood panels, which was not typical of Rembrandt's works. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that the original was painted on a single wood panel. He puts forth the idea that additional wood panels were added to the painting later in an attempt to increase its price.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-23 | Yash Mehta | 75 | view |
| 2023-07-01 | theprasad | 60 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | fmichela | 90 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | Yam Kumar Oli | 35 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | Yam Kumar Oli | 52 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... painting is not the work of Rembrandt. The lecturer challenges the statements made...
^^^
Line 3, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ndly, the writer contends that the light and shadow appear incorrectly in the pai...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, look, second, secondly, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1143.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 236.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84322033898 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45049740215 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 145.348785872 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487288135593 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 342.9 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3029944414 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.9230769231 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1538461538 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.