online encyclopedia
the reading is about the problematic reasons of communal online encyclopedia which is a rich and modern source of information that allows people to add information and make changes in the existing ones. the professor however, disagrees with all these reasons
firstly, the reading states that online encyclopedia are not written by experts as opposed to traditional paper based encyclopedia. Therefore, these new ones are more prone to errors. the professor challenged this belief by stating that traditional ones were in fact not error free as well. and there is no such resource as perfect. but at least the online ones allow people to correct the mistakes as opposed to the traditional printed ones.
secondly the reading posits that online encyclopedia can be a target of hackers. information could be deleted or changed and there is no way a user could be informed whether the information is authentic or not. the professor refutes this idea by ensuring that essential information is available in a format that cannot be edited. Moreover, special editors check all the entries regularly to make sure of their authenticity.
Finally, the reading suggests that online encyclopedia focus too much on trivial issues. for example, a topic about a runner could take up as much space as a historical event and users might not be able to differentiate between important and trivial issues. the professor believed this is a prejudice way of thinking to decide what people should consider important. she stated that with the traditional encyclopedia there used to be a problem of space. and because space was limited only subjects that were significant in the eyes of academic authorities had a chance to be published, and it surely did not reflect the interest of people. with the new encyclopedia space is not a problem. there is endless space for any topic to be included. Thus, the diversity of these topics are so wide that anyone can find information about their topic of interest.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-16 | TiOluwani97 | 87 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | keisham | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-06 | nilav | view | |
| 2023-04-05 | Dat_Nguyen | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-28 | MotherAstronaut | 85 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the reading is about the problematic reason...
^^^
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... and make changes in the existing ones. the professor however, disagrees with all t...
^^^
Line 2, column 185, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...hese new ones are more prone to errors. the professor challenged this belief by sta...
^^^
Line 2, column 292, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...es were in fact not error free as well. and there is no such resource as perfect. b...
^^^
Line 2, column 334, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...d there is no such resource as perfect. but at least the online ones allow people t...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...posed to the traditional printed ones. secondly the reading posits that online encyclop...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Information
...ncyclopedia can be a target of hackers. information could be deleted or changed and there i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...er the information is authentic or not. the professor refutes this idea by ensuring...
^^^
Line 4, column 89, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...pedia focus too much on trivial issues. for example, a topic about a runner could t...
^^^
Line 4, column 258, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...e between important and trivial issues. the professor believed this is a prejudice ...
^^^
Line 4, column 366, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
... what people should consider important. she stated that with the traditional encycl...
^^^
Line 4, column 453, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...ia there used to be a problem of space. and because space was limited only subjects...
^^^
Line 4, column 639, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: With
...did not reflect the interest of people. with the new encyclopedia space is not a pro...
^^^^
Line 4, column 689, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...ew encyclopedia space is not a problem. there is endless space for any topic to be in...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, well, at least, for example, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 10.4613686534 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 328.0 270.72406181 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06097560976 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83895000322 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524390243902 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 419.366225166 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.0445074005 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2222222222 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 4.19205298013 334% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269873724632 0.272083759551 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954516486536 0.0996497079465 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132994208085 0.0662205650399 201% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178814355162 0.162205337803 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489708303236 0.0443174109184 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 63.6247240618 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.