Palm oil
The reading states three benfits of palm oil production. Admitting some probable benefits of palm oil, the lecturer contradicts the merits stated in the reading.
First, according to the passages, growing palm trees would reduce the rate of deforestation due to its high oil yield resulting in less required land use. The lecturer, however, argues that higher desirablity of palm oil in food and cosmetic industries has cause an ever-growing demand for this product. Thus, this constant increasing demand requires higher deforestation rate, up to 7000 km2 every minute, to prepare land for plating palm trees.
Second, it is true that buring biodiesel emits less carrbon in comparison to fossil fuels, yet the processes involeved with growing palm trees have a high carbon emission. To prepare and clear the land, farmers burn the vegitations on the land including "peat", leading to an enurmous amount of CO2 release to the atmosphere.
Third, the reading mentions that palm farms are usually controlled and owned by low-income farmers, and growing palm trees has higher profit for them compared with that of in growing other plants. However, the speaker points out that these farmers often do not control the farms for long. Big farm companies usually see a great commercial opportunity in these farms. They obtain the land and farm. As a result the farmers loose their land and get verry little money.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-15 | saamaan | 90 | view |
| 2024-01-15 | saamaan | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | YasamanEsml | 60 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2022-12-17 | shekoo20 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 423, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
... land and farm. As a result the farmers loose their land and get verry little money.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, so, third, thus, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1195.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 229.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21834061135 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66605241363 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637554585153 0.540411800872 118% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.301314319 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5833333333 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0833333333 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332597352836 0.272083759551 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129373515828 0.0996497079465 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13712966756 0.0662205650399 207% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222075698159 0.162205337803 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.156837619305 0.0443174109184 354% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.