Some people believe that parents should pay their children a small amount of money to do jobs around the home (such as washing the dishes or taking out the garbage), while other people believe that parents should not pay their children to do these tasks. Which view do you agree with, and why?
Parenting is one of the most challenging experiences. Every day parents encounter different circumstances, making decisions with accepting their consequences. Although undoubtedly assigning children some household tasks is necessary can increase their responsibility, the question which may come up at this point is whether parents should pay their children chores allowance or not. Opponents may bring up raising unreal expectations as the demerit of this payment, while proponents claim that its benefits outweigh. I strongly agree to pay for doing household chores not only as a way to teach money management but also an external motivation.
Firstly, children should learn life skills from early ages in the family; money management is an essential one and includes earning, saving and spending. Therefore, parents can pay their children some amount of money in turn for doing routine tasks of the house like doing the wishes, tidying their bedrooms, and other chores in order to teach them this fact that money is earned by working. Furthermore, earning and saving money bit by bit is a businesslike practice to prepare children for their future professional work. They will save and spend their money more cautiously provided that they make effort to earn it.
Second, household tasks are inevitable personal activities for everyone. Chore allowance can be stimulating for contributing regularly in the family. When they earn in turn of their duties, they feel more independent and responsible. This can be their first experience of a real paid-work. Moreover, parents can make a list of chores and the price of doing them and pay more money for the more difficult tasks, illustrating the direct relationship between effort and money and productivity value of hard work.
All in all, chores allowance is a practical tool to teach children money management, responsibility, and productivity despite the fact that it can imply that only the paid one is worthy works. even if someone does not want to link the children’s pocket money to their routine duties, It is recommended to encourage them to do an extra work at home or a Saturday job to earn money by their own and benefit from its merits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-04 | najisa | 70 | view |
| 2019-03-28 | persepolistmm | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-16 | mahi22 | 63 | view |
| 2019-01-13 | 30vil | 68 | view |
| 2018-08-22 | negar_nouri123 | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement to generate electricity people should use clean sources like solar and wind and not use polluting sources like coal or oil 76
- TPO 70 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement to generate electricity people should use clean sources like solar and wind and not use polluting sources like coal or oil 90
- TPO1-TASK1 3
- Spartacus as a hero 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 194, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Even
...that only the paid one is worthy works. even if someone does not want to link the ch...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1860.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 356.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22471910112 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92306021579 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542134831461 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3747534512 48.9658058833 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.25 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4375 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296456131495 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0942078284213 0.076458572812 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797846932723 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194503808587 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061701668115 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.