The passage and lecture are both about a portraits of old woman, which is may or may not doing by Rembrandt the writer claims that this portrait by was not done by Rembrandt, the lecturer cast doubt on claim made in the article. She believes that this portrait was done by Rembrandt.
First, the author states that the outlet of the portrait is in consistent, it combines between white linen cap which a kind of servants clothes and a fur which is luxury style he believes that Rembrandt does not do like this mistake. The lecturer contradicts on this point. She mentions, that fur collar did not find in the original painting that, she says, this fur added to increase the value of this work.
Second, the author state, the depicting between light and shadow was not perfect, He argue that illumination of face not consist with the presence of fur below the face. The professor rebuts this argument. She suggests, the depiction between light and shadow in the original portrait was doing perfectly especially after remove of fur which was added after the portrait was completed.
Lastly, the author explains that that painter uses a many panels to paint the portrait then glued them together, he claim that was not Rembrandt manner. The lecturer in the other hand says the original painting was painted on single panel, after that it was expanded by adding extra panels.
The passage and lecture are both about a portraits of old woman, which is may or may not doing by Rembrandt the writer claims that this portrait by was not done by Rembrandt, the lecturer cast doubt on claim made in the article. She believes that this portrait was done by Rembrandt.
First, the author states that the outlet of the portrait is in consistent, it combines between white linen cap which a kind of servants clothes and a fur which is luxury style he believes that Rembrandt does not do like this mistake. The lecturer contradicts on this point. She mentions, that fur collar did not find in the original painting that, she says, this fur added to increase the value of this work.
Second, the author state, the depicting between light and shadow was not perfect, He argue that illumination of face not consist with the presence of fur below the face. The professor rebuts this argument. She suggests, the depiction between light and shadow in the original portrait was doing perfectly especially after remove of fur which was added after the portrait was completed.
Lastly, the author explains that that painter uses a many panels to paint the portrait then glued them together, he claim that was not Rembrandt manner. The lecturer in the other hand says the original painting was painted on single panel, after that it was expanded by adding extra panels.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-08 | talelaldabous | 71 | view |
- The passage and lecture are both talking about presence of soft tissue from remnant of blood vessels in resent discovered fossils The author claims three evidences which support present of soft tissue blood vessels in these fossils The lecturer casts doub 60
- Every day there are a lot of event that may occur around our life these either effect or daily life or not But the question is if it is important to know about these event or no This can be weighed in many aspect Admittedly some people believe it is not a 60
- The reading passage and lecture are both talking about glass building material these building may injury birds because they cannot distinguish between glass and air space The author gives three solutions to treat this problem The lecture casts doubt on cl 60
- The reading passage and lecture are both about Pterosaurs which were ancient group of winged reptiles that lived together with dinosaurs and if they were capable of powered flight or just glide The writer claims several argument to explain that Pterosaurs 68
- The main topic in reading passage and lecture about Agnostides which are a group of marine animals These species extinicted befor many years ago and their fossils do no give a good information about them The writer claims several theriories about how Agno 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The passage and lecture are both about a...
^^
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a portrait' or simply 'portraits'?
Suggestion: a portrait; portraits
... The passage and lecture are both about a portraits of old woman, which is may or may not d...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t this portrait was done by Rembrandt. First, the author states that the outlet...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed to increase the value of this work. Second, the author state, the depicting ...
^^^
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...en light and shadow was not perfect, He argue that illumination of face not consist w...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dded after the portrait was completed. Lastly, the author explains that that pa...
^^^^
Line 4, column 121, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'claims'.
Suggestion: claims
...e portrait then glued them together, he claim that was not Rembrandt manner. The lect...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, lastly, may, second, so, then, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1140.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 237.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81012658228 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35745310554 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514767932489 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 333.0 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.7901882538 49.2860985944 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06452816374 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.533259146468 0.272083759551 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.231746815563 0.0996497079465 233% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.241818702839 0.0662205650399 365% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.360449412779 0.162205337803 222% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.319507224813 0.0443174109184 721% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 53.8541721854 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.7273730684 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.