In the past several years, a number of technological advances have made laser eye surgery more widely available.
The reading and the lecture are both about the eye surgery, its effectiveness and costs. According to the reading passage, the weaknesses of the surgery and related with the operation high costs make those surgeries unlikely become popular. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article. By using the following evidence, she posits that neither high costs nor long healing time is accurate constituents of the procedure.
To begin with, the professor contends that the price per surgery is decreasing, demonstrating that the actual decrease in price has already reached thirty per cent for just several years. The growth of competition among different surgeons and technological boom both constitute actually to the decrease in price of such procedures. This statement counters the authors point, according to which the price of the eye surgery grows up, driven mostly by an increase in the cost side of the medical procedure. Likewise, the author does not take into account the technological developments and makes his assumptions, saying that the cost of surgery is positively correlated with the use of high quality machines.
Furthermore, according to the lecture, his people who meet post-operative problems are usually extremums. The professor demonstrates that patients with side effects behaved inconsistently with the healing practice, climbing on Everest, where the pressure is much higher. She states that it usually takes no more than three days to recover from the operation. This point differs from one in the article, according to which it usually takes long to recover after the surgeon intervention. Moreover, the author points out that the marketing efforts try to confuse patients with the wrong information about quick healing.
By the same token, the lecturer puts forth the idea that it is extremely uncommon to return to the surgeon in order to repeat the procedure after a short time period. She states that the humanity has cases which demonstrate the long-lasting effect of the surgery and it could take more than twenty years to deteriorate again.
All in all, the evidence referred to by the lecturer challenges the idea that the eye surgery will never become popular among public.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-21 | Winner_007 | 83 | view |
| 2020-12-21 | Winner_007 | 81 | view |
| 2020-12-21 | Winner_007 | 81 | view |
| 2020-12-21 | Winner_007 | 3 | view |
| 2020-09-15 | bijan54 | 75 | view |
- As early as the twelfth century A D the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their great houses massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand three or four stories high Archaeologist 3
- In the 1950s Torreya Taxifolia a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida started to die out No one is sure exactly what caused the decline but chances are good that if nothing is done Torreya will soon become extinct Experts are co 3
- In recent years there has been a dramatic increase in the availability of organic foods Organic foods are regulated by the government thus in order to officially be termed organic they must be grown without pesticides or artificial fertilizers In just a s 80
- In recent years there has been a dramatic increase in the availability of organic foods Organic foods are regulated by the government thus in order to officially be termed organic they must be grown without pesticides or artificial fertilizers In just a s 80
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, furthermore, if, likewise, moreover, so, to begin with, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 30.3222958057 175% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1871.0 1373.03311258 136% => OK
No of words: 356.0 270.72406181 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25561797753 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77511457219 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 145.348785872 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556179775281 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 419.366225166 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2956410824 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.9375 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1875 7.06452816374 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.018364492444 0.272083759551 7% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00583721102579 0.0996497079465 6% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0226074210912 0.0662205650399 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00795656021599 0.162205337803 5% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.015913120432 0.0443174109184 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 63.6247240618 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.