Pluto's status as the planet
In an overview, in this lecture and reading discussed arguments about pluto as a planet. Admittedly, the points in the lecture cast doubt on the points in the reading.
First of all, the lecture states that the decision to chang pluto's status was controversial; some scientist disagree about decision while, other group vote for this change in the astronomers international community. However this is contrasts the point of reading that the decision was reached by a strong majority vote.
Furthermore, about the new definition of the planet, well, lecture states that critics think new definition is not adequate or realistic. Also, they believe new definition is not correct and comparison would be similar bodies planets. Although, this is opposes with clues of the reading that asserts new definition is clear and precise.
Finally, the lecture explain to calling pluto a "dwarf planet" lead to controversy and confusion and makes this question why is a dwarf planet not a real planet?
consequently, it causes to many problem for education systems. This challenges the content in the reading that astronomers agree that pluto is not a true planet and it is a dwarf planet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-04 | hosseindehnamaki | 81 | view |
- Plow in agriculture 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Subjects such as art, music, and drama should be a part of every child's basic education.Use specific reasons and example to support your opinion. 78
- Satisfying jobs for the workers 75
- Study of cooperation and conflict between same age groups children 80
- Big problems in breeding dog industry 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In an overview, in this lecture and reading discussed ar...
^^
Line 5, column 217, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...he astronomers international community. However this is contrasts the point of reading ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the new definition of the planet, well, lecture states that critics think new de...
^^
Line 13, column 47, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...y, the lecture explain to calling pluto a 'dwarf planet' lead to contro...
^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
... is a dwarf planet not a real planet? consequently, it causes to many problem for educatio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 28, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun problem seems to be countable; consider using: 'many problems'.
Suggestion: many problems
...al planet? consequently, it causes to many problem for education systems. This challenges ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, however, so, well, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 1373.03311258 74% => OK
No of words: 192.0 270.72406181 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27604166667 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86016705029 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 145.348785872 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 419.366225166 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.83651446 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.3 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.7 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231494816128 0.272083759551 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0871833226575 0.0996497079465 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102512122829 0.0662205650399 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138102582467 0.162205337803 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0745373677916 0.0443174109184 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.