portrait of jane austen
The article is about the most famous English novelist portrait. In which the article supports that the portrait is of Jane Austen and is supported by little evidence. However, the professor sees flaws in this evidence and disagrees with each.
To begin with, the author states that her extended family was permitted to use the portrait as an illustration and the family recognized that the portrait is of Jane Austen only. However the professor disagree and stated that she died 17 years ago, her family had not seen her themselves and they must not be sure about it.
To carry on further, the author states that the portrait is as similar to that of Cassandra's sketch as of adult Jane Austen and matches every feature like eyebrow, nose, face, and overall shape. However the professor shows the other side of it, he stated that as Jane has extended family and many cousins, so there are chances that the sketch could be of any of them. He states that this cousin Mary and Caupia could have resembled the true subject because of this confusion and unsure about the sketch.
Another point made by the author is that this portrait was made by Humphrey, who was active at that time, as Jane's family was wealthy, they would have hired them for a portrait. The author also gave one more piece of evidence that the style links with Ozias Humphrey. The professor sees flaws in this claim and states that when we look at the back of this painting it illustrates that it was made by William lack, who was active when Jane was old.
So these are the two sides presented about the Jane Austen portrait, in which the author support that the painting is of her only. However, the professor disagrees with each claim and proves himself true and so that portrait was not a famous novelist James Austen.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-06 | YasamanEsml | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | ayumiyazaki | 81 | view |
| 2022-12-09 | Kairavishah2001 | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | rpinisetti8 | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-13 | EiLonMask | 73 | view |
- People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do 70
- people spend time on things which they should not 73
- In order for any work of art for example a film a novel a poem or a song to have merit it must be understandable to most people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 50
- online program are better or offline program 76
- people are not doing what they should do 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...at the portrait is of Jane Austen only. However the professor disagree and stated that ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...eyebrow, nose, face, and overall shape. However the professor shows the other side of i...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 353, Rule ID: OF_ANY_OF[1]
Message: Consider simply using 'of' instead.
Suggestion: of
...re are chances that the sketch could be of any of them. He states that this cousin Mary a...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, look, so, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 12.0772626932 182% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 22.412803532 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 318.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66666666667 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.18747707894 2.5805825403 85% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477987421384 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 457.2 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5824553353 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.153846154 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4615384615 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.92307692308 7.06452816374 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360547975566 0.272083759551 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154783018581 0.0996497079465 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144191322602 0.0662205650399 218% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243878004713 0.162205337803 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0817680884369 0.0443174109184 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 53.8541721854 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...at the portrait is of Jane Austen only. However the professor disagree and stated that ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...eyebrow, nose, face, and overall shape. However the professor shows the other side of i...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 353, Rule ID: OF_ANY_OF[1]
Message: Consider simply using 'of' instead.
Suggestion: of
...re are chances that the sketch could be of any of them. He states that this cousin Mary a...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, look, so, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 12.0772626932 182% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 22.412803532 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 318.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66666666667 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.18747707894 2.5805825403 85% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477987421384 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 457.2 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5824553353 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.153846154 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4615384615 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.92307692308 7.06452816374 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360547975566 0.272083759551 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154783018581 0.0996497079465 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144191322602 0.0662205650399 218% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243878004713 0.162205337803 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0817680884369 0.0443174109184 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 53.8541721854 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.