whether the portrait "Portrait Of An Elderly Woman in a White Boonet" by Rembrandt is an original piece or not.
Both in the reading passage and the lecture talks about whether the portrait "Portrait Of An Elderly Woman in a White Boonet" by Rembrandt is an original piece or not. The reading passage states that it is not original for three reasons that are: the way woman in the portrait is dressed is inconsistent, the light and shadow in the portrait does not fit and lastly the portrait is foumd to be painted on deveral pieces of wood glued together. But the lectur contradicts all the reasons given in the reading passage.
First of all, the author contends that the woman in the portrait is wearing a fur coat and accordinmg to author is a luxurious one and that time no servant could afford it. Rembrandt was a person who paid attention to details and this seemed inconsistent. But the lecturer contradicts this by saying that the fur collar wasn't there in original painting. The layer of fur collar was added on top of original painting by someone else hundreds of years after the original painting was made to increase the value of it.
Secondly, the author argues that Rembrandt was a master of painting light and shadow, but in the painting there elements do not fit together. The face appears to be illuminated by light below but gets absorbed by the fur collar and also appears partially in shadow due to dark fur collar The lecturer refutes these points by saying that when the fur collar is removed, one can see a simple original collar of light collar and it naturally reflects and illuminnates the face. And it looks realistic in reality instead of dark and under shadow.
Lastly, the reading claims that the painting is made on a panel made of several pieces of wood glued together. But the lecturer opposes by stating that the pieces of wood were glued later and were added to original painting to increase it's size. Additionally, the original painting is made on a single wood panel and that wood panel on examination is same as found in his self portrait. Hence, the lecturer concluded that the portrait "Portrait Of An Elderly Woman in a White Boonet" by Rembrandt is an original piece.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-09 | Kairavishah2001 | 73 | view |
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this time period most of the complain 60
- Professor benefit from appearing on televisiom 81
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 66
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter the college 66
- it is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...icts this by saying that the fur collar wasnt there in original painting. The layer o...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, lastly, look, second, secondly, so, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.4613686534 201% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 7.30242825607 274% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 30.3222958057 175% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1757.0 1373.03311258 128% => OK
No of words: 370.0 270.72406181 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74864864865 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61141087615 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.424324324324 0.540411800872 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 545.4 419.366225166 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.0153399192 49.2860985944 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.5 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 21.698381199 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.06452816374 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383909802703 0.272083759551 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141095623292 0.0996497079465 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.207345411047 0.0662205650399 313% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250264781079 0.162205337803 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.192778414039 0.0443174109184 435% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.