Private collector and the fossils
The author and the lecturer talk about the selling of historical fossils in the market. In the reading passage ,the author talks about the disadvantage of having private business run by collectors. The lecturer, however, refutes the claim. Further, she mentions three main reasons to support her arguments.
First, the author mentions, the interest of public will reduce to see fossils. He says that when private collectors will sell the fossil to particular buyers then it will not be able to get displayed in the museums due to which it will also influences the local curiosity towards the historical artifacts. The professor, nevertheless, opposes the statement. She mentions that when collector sells the fossils, more buyers will which approach to get the product. Hence, it will not decrease the public interest toward the historical remaining.
Secondly, the reading passage states that scientists will miss the important details related to the history, if it is directly sold to buyers. Further, the price of these fossils are so high that universities or any government authorities are not capable enough to invest such money on this. However, the lecturer denies the fact. She says that every fossil found by the collector is anaylze by the scientists. Therefore, it is not possible that an offical authority will loose access to the most important fossils.
Lastly, the writer argues that private vendors are not so knowledgeable about these essential materials so they can damage the fossils during the handling process. The profess refutes the statement. She says that exvacation of any important site is only done by scientists and professors of university. So, they take care of the fossils and also provide instruction for fragile materials. Hence, fossils will not get damage through the private collectors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-22 | Haleh Rezazadeh | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-30 | Yam Kumar Oli | 3 | view |
| 2022-12-26 | YAGUT | 81 | view |
| 2022-11-11 | stupidfella | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-16 | Prabesh Dhakal | 68 | view |
- It is more important to keep your old friends than to make new friends 66
- Rembrandts painting origin whether it is actually rembrandts or not 73
- People today are much better informed about international news than they were in the past 66
- Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past 70
- Students are more influence by their teacher than by their parents 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ls in the market. In the reading passage ,the author talks about the disadvantage ...
^^
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'influence'
Suggestion: influence
...n the museums due to which it will also influences the local curiosity towards the histori...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 473, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...possible that an offical authority will loose access to the most important fossils. ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 165, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...he fossils during the handling process. The profess refutes the statement. She says that ex...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, lastly, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 291.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30240549828 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71317974697 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539518900344 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.8175571395 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.2105263158 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3157894737 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84210526316 7.06452816374 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277837688639 0.272083759551 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736507607594 0.0996497079465 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0925851115919 0.0662205650399 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159026094545 0.162205337803 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401052399732 0.0443174109184 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.