Pro's and con's of driverless cars
The reading supports driverless cars, while the lecture opposes it.
First of all, the reading claims that automated cars are safer because they designed by software. However, the lecture casts doubt on the reading claim. He says that it is true that software is not capable of doing mistakes but the software itself a problem because it designed humans. Moreover, the software doesn't deal with whether because it is not detecting the snow and rain.
Second, the passage posits that driverless releases less pollution and it is good for the environment. On the other hand, the professor said that driverless cars increase pollution. According to the professor, the recent article states that because of these cars fewer people use public transport and a large number of personal cars. As a result, pollution increases.
Lastly, the reading passage makes an argument that driverless cars provide free time for people to do their work. In contrast, the professor casts doubt on this claim. He stated that although there were fewer stops with these cars it needs to stop. Furthermore, the free time is distracting and people can not work in those conditions.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- human believes on elephant 65
- Early twentieth century Chaco construction purpose. the professor refutes the reading claims mentioned in the passage. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 309, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...designed humans. Moreover, the software doesnt deal with whether because it is not det...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...s fewer people use public transport and a large number of personal cars. As a result, pollution i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, lastly, moreover, second, so, while, in contrast, as a result, first of all, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 30.3222958057 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 969.0 1373.03311258 71% => OK
No of words: 190.0 270.72406181 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50694879161 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 145.348785872 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589473684211 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 419.366225166 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4480881537 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.5384615385 110.228320801 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6153846154 21.698381199 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7692307692 7.06452816374 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115021482671 0.272083759551 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0403979237414 0.0996497079465 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443385636173 0.0662205650399 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0724065794016 0.162205337803 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333929399633 0.0443174109184 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.