Pterosaurs
The reading mainly talks about the reasons why pterosaurs can't fly. However, in the listening, the woman challenges what is stated in the passage with three strong reasons.
Firstly, in the passage, it is said that pterosaurs are cold-blooded animals and they are unable to generate enough energy for them to fly. But in the listening, the woman thinks that dense hairs are covered on the surface of pterosaurs, it's possible for pterosaurs to keep a high temperature and generate enough energy to fly.
Secondly, it's stated in the passage that pterosaurs are too heavy to fly. On the contrary, the woman believes that bones of pterosaurs are small and their air-bones make them able to fly above the wind.
Last but not least, the passage holds a perspective that pterosaurs don't have strong enough muscles for them to launch themselves into the air. On the other hand, the speaker thinks pterosaurs can launch because they have four legs rather than two legs. These legs can provide enough speed and height for pterosaurs to launch.
- In recent years many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems in which frogs live for example fro 85
- burning mirror 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Pterosaurs 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... talks about the reasons why pterosaurs cant fly. However, in the listening, the wom...
^^^^
Line 7, column 69, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...age holds a perspective that pterosaurs dont have strong enough muscles for them to ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 868.0 1373.03311258 63% => OK
No of words: 175.0 270.72406181 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 4.04702891845 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46453373493 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 145.348785872 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554285714286 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 419.366225166 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6655194843 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4444444444 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.55555555556 7.06452816374 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374998080743 0.272083759551 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179730010872 0.0996497079465 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712791755417 0.0662205650399 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233581201519 0.162205337803 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496628824188 0.0443174109184 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.42419426049 84% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 63.6247240618 44% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.